Answer:
p = 5,624
Step-by-step explanation:
(32,476 + p) / 381 = 100
multiply both sides by 381
32,476 + p = 38,100
Subtract 32476 from both sides
p = 5,624
C
By subtracting 18 to both sides you are separating the 3x because you are not ready to isolate the variable (x) in step 1
Answer and Step-by-step explanation: The null and alternative hypothesis for this test are:
To test it, use F-test statistics and compare variances of each treatment.
Calculate F-value:
F = 1.8356
The <u>critical value of F</u> is given by a F-distribution table with:
degree of freedom (row): 20 - 1 = 19
degree of freedom (column): 20 - 1 = 19
And a significance level: α = 0.05
= 2.2341
Comparing both values of F:
1.856 < 2.2341
i.e. F-value calculated is less than F-value of the table.
Therefore, failed to reject 
, meaning there is <u>no sufficient data to support the claim</u> that sham treatment have pain reductions which vary more than for those using magnets treatment.
Answer:
D={3,9}
The numbers are 3 and 9
Step-by-step explanation:
The set A
={,,,,,,,,,}
Let B be the sub set of A containing odd numbers
B={1,3,5,7,9}
Let C be the sub set of A containing multiply of 3
C= {3,6,9}
Now let D be the be the sub set of A containing both odd numbers and multiples of 3
D={3,9}
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller perfect squares near 99 is 81
Larger perfect square near 99 is 100
First step would be to find the two perfect squares that lies between on the number line. I could then think about the number 99 and how close it is to the smaller perfect square and the larger perfect square. That could tell me how far above or below the of the two perfect squares 99 lies on the number line. I could then take the square root of the perfect squares to see how I would estimate the square root of 99. The √99 is almost 10.
81 < 99 < 100
√81 < √99 < √100
8 < √99 < 10
So, √99 is almost 10.
