Answer:
b)
Explanation:
Sensitive issues refer to topics which people tend to feel uncomfortable talking about (Like harassment, addictions, violence)
Many studies on this topic have shown that when people are in front of other person who's interviewing them they might hide some aspects of themselves to create a better impression on the interviewer, therefore, the information acquired this way is not 100% right.
Regarding <u>sensitive issues, it is even more difficult for people to talk about them specially when it comes to an stranger</u> (like a researcher). Thus, it is not recommended to address sensitive issues in interviews but rather by <u>self-administered questionnaires in which the person doesn't have to interact with another person.</u>
<u />
When it comes to complicated issues, a questionnaire is not recommended since it could leave the researcher without enough information, and since it's <u>a complicated issue, the researcher might want to be there to clarify people's answers.</u> Therefore, <u>for complicated issues, it is better to use interviews.</u>
Thus, the correct answer is b) Use self-administered questionnaires for sensitive issues and interviews for complicated issues
old fashion prejudice was different from today because back then every thing was one way and they did not like change. And these days prejudice is caused because people think that other people are not "cool" enough to hang out with them. So in the olden days it was because of race, these days its because people are rude and need Jesus.
Answer: (C) A child’s tongue is proportionally larger, increasing the chances of airway occlusion from even minor swelling.
Explanation:
Children have smaller mouths, yet their tongues are proportionately large in their mouths compared to those of adults in their mouths. If it were to swell larger from a sting, it could obstruct the airway.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is FALSE that Jeremy Bentham and the rest of the utilitarians believe that the principle of utility should be applied to humans only, excluding the animals.
This is evident when Jeremy Bentham and other utilitarians argued that Principal of Utility is based on the belief that the action of individuals is good in as much it leads to the happiness of the individual involved.
And the application of the principle of utility to animals (other than human) is sufficient only if during the exploitation of animals, the animals experience happiness more than pain.
