Amount invested in both schemes is $45,000
returns in investment g is 75,000 in 6 years.
yearly return is:
75000/6=12,500
returns in investment h is 105,000 in 9 years
yearly return is:
105,000/9
=11,666.67
from the above results we can conclude that investment g has the higher returns.
SORRY I NEED MORE INFO what exactly are you looking for?
Answer:
Remain constant.
Explanation:
As Spain produces more digital cameras and fewer camcorders, the opportunity cost of producing each additional digital camera <u>remain constant. </u>
Production possibility frontier is a curve that show how different combination of product are produced using limited resources. It demonstrate that how production of one goods need to be decreased to produce higher number of other goods.
Opportunity cost is constant, as tradeoffs are the same regardless of where you are on the line, same slope at any point.
Explanation:
Well, start off by asking <em>what</em><em> </em>audience you want to reach? If you want to have a target audience to children, you would want to use easy-to-understand wording and most likely little kid characters who they could relate to.
Put yourself in the position of someone you want to target. Younger people? Well, how did you feel when you were younger/how do you feel now?
Do you're readers know you? Often authors will have similarities in the characters they write about, for instance a person of color might use a character who is also of color and explain about racial injustices they have.
Put yourself in their place and see from their pov!
Answer:
EV of node 4 = 0.6×5 + 0.4×0 = 3
EV of node 5 = 0.1×5 + 0.9×0 = 0.5
EV of node 2 = (0.8×5 + 0.2×EV of node 4) - 3
EV of node 2 = (0.8×5 + 0.2×3 ) - 3
EV of node 2 = 4.6 - 3
EV of node 2 = 1.6
EV of node 3 = (0.5×5 + 0.5×EV of node 5) - 1
EV of node 3 = (0.5×5 + 0.5×0.5 ) - 1
EV of node 3 = 2.75 - 1
EV of node 3 = 1.75
EV of node 3 is higher, therefore, best attend pattern is to attend randomly.
