It was geographical; a fort on the Pacific Ocean enabled fur trading with Asia
<span>The answer is letter C.
The power to sign treaties is not a shared power by the federal and state governments. It is mostly the responsibility of the legislative and executive departments of the US government. Treaties are conditions that have been voted upon the majority of the legislative department that still needs to approved by the executive part of government.
Other decisions like levying taxes, borrowing money, and maintaining a court systems are powers both shared by the federal and state governments. <span>
</span></span>
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
You got it right because you saw the evidence of it.
I believe it would be pathos because the statement “a family man” and “our community” is like an emotional appeal and sense of ownership.
Answer;
They felt that they were fairly apprehended due to limited amount of supplies and army. Additionally the people in Northeast had business ties with Britain, therefore it was hard for them to go to war with their business partners. Again the people from the west and south felt and considered it a problem of the north.
<span>The northern states were heavily involved in international trade, having the ports and ship building yards. The men who sailed on those ships were likewise mostly from the north and were the ones being impressed into the British navy. The agrarian south's interests lay entirely in the production of tobacco, cotton, sugar, sorghum and a few other large cash crops. The commerce was mostly within America and they had little interest in shipping issues.</span>