In the case,Texas v.Johnson,the texas court tried and convicted Mr.Johnson for violating the statute that prohibited the desecration of venerated objects e.g the American flag that could arouse anger in other individuals.Johnson appealed with the argument that the actions were a "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment.
Texas laws punishes actions such as flag burning that might arouse anger in other but it this case the outrage alone couldnot justify for supressing Johnson's freedom of speech.In this perspective,the Texas law discriminated upon view point in that though it punishes such actions,it still specifically exempt prosecution of actions with similar defination such as burning or burying of worn-out flag.
Therefore, flag burning in Texas v.Johnson constituted a symbolic speech and is protected by the Firts Amendment.
Answer:
understand different dimensions of organisational culture understand the role of the cultural strength explore sub sculptures within an organisation is
In the pivotal case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. Segregation, the Court said, was not discrimination.
The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 was able to address the issue of presidential succession by enacting that an acting President can be appointed from officer lower in the order of succession.
Presidential Succession Act 1947 was enacted to address the issue of power succession if the neither the President nor Vice President are able to discharge the powers and duties of the office.
In conclusion, the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 was able to address the issue of presidential succession by enacting that an acting President can be appointed from officer higher in the order of succession.
Read more about Presidential Succession Act
<em>brainly.com/question/2221171</em>
