Answer:
1. Emotional paradox.
Explanation:
The paradox of the emotions refers to the disconnect, when we study emotions they appear self-evident and apparent and in objective scientific terms, they were exceedingly difficult to define. An individual think they know about an emotion when they see it, and because of it conclude that emotions are distinct phenomenons that can be detected with some degree of accuracy, but scientists still need to create a clear parameters to determine the presence of emotions.
Answer:
b.The Nazis said that they would offer a pardon to anyone who had returned illegally.
Answer: It was the main cause of death in the 1200s
Explanation:
A.It affected people in Africa, Asia, and Europe option does make sense, but it doesn't best describe the bubonic plague.
B.It started in Europe and spread to Asia. True, but still doesn't really explain the bubonic plague
C. It was the main cause of death in the 1200s, that sums it up the best, the world's population declined by almost half during the plague, so it describes it the best.
D. It literally makes no sense and completely false, they used this method to get rid of bodies since so many people were dying.
Answer:
A protection racket is a scheme where a potentially hazardous group guarantees protection from violence, looting, raiding, piracy, and other such threats posed by them outside the sanction of the law, to polities, businesses, individuals, or other entities and groups that pay to them in cash or kind. In other words, it is a racket that sells security, traditionally physical security. Through the credible threat of violence, the racketeers deter people from swindling, robbing, injuring, sabotaging or otherwise harming their clients. Protection rackets tend to appear in markets in which the police and judiciary cannot be counted on to provide legal protection, because of incompetence (as in weak or failed states) or illegality (black markets). Protection rackets are indistinguishable in practice from extortion rackets and distinguishable from private security by some degree of implied threat that the racketeers themselves may attack the business if it fails to pay for their protection. A distinction is possible between a "pure" extortion racket in which the racketeers might agree only not to attack a business and a broader protection racket offering some real private security in addition to such extortion. The criminals might agree to defend a business from any attack by either themselves or third parties (other criminal gangs). However, in reality, that distinction is doubtful, because extortion racketeers may have to defend their clients against rival gangs to maintain their profits. By corollary, criminal gangs may have to maintain control of territories (turfs), as local businesses may collapse if forced to pay for protection from too many rackets, which then hurts all parties involved. Certain scholars, such as Diego Gambetta, classify criminal organizations engaged in protection racketeering as "mafia", as the racket is popular with both the Sicilian Mafia and Italian-American Mafia.
Explanation:
A protection racket is an operation where criminals provide protection to persons and properties, settle disputes and enforce contracts in markets where the police and judicial system cannot be relied upon. Protection racketeers or mafia groups operate mostly in the black market, providing buyers and sellers the security they need for smooth transactions; but empirical data collected by Gambetta and Varese suggests that mafia groups are able to offer private protection to corporations and individuals in legal markets when the state fails to offer sufficient and efficient protection to the people in need. Two elements distinguish racketeers from legal security firms. The first element is their willingness to deploy violent forms of retribution (going as far as murder) that fall outside the limits the law normally extends to civilian security firms. The other element is that racketeers are willing to involve themselves in illegal markets
Answer: Alright, so I was kinda confused with this specific question, but I'm gonna give it a try.
The Church is the Sacrament of Salvation because She is both a Sign and Instrument of God's Salvation for Humanity. The Church is the Sacrament of Communion because She is God's Instrument to bring Human Beings into Communion with God and with each other through the Grace of the Sacraments. ( What Catholics strongly believe in) ( The pronoun " She" means Mary in this text).
In the Christian church the tradition is joined not only to the teachings of Jesus and the story of his life as prophet and teacher but also to the central event of the history of salvation, which his life, Passion, death, and Resurrection. ( What Protestants strongly believes in)
Anyone can receive salvation in Christ through repentance and faith. This means turning away from sinful ways (repentance) and turning to God (faith), trusting in Christ. Jesus will forgive your sins and set you on a path to life with Him. ( What both Protestants and Catholics strongly believe)
Salavation can only be done through Jesus Christ. Read in the Bible, Romans 10:9, and it clearly states how to get saved/ recieve salvation. That is if you don't believe anything that I'm writting down. Take it from the Bible please do, don't take it from me.
Explanation: I'm not sure if that's the answer to the question that you were looking for, but I did my best.
