All categories

3 years ago

Professional athletes attempting only to maximize income will defer larger salaries if:

1 answer:

4 0

Professional athletes attempting only to maximize income will defer larger salaries if DEFERRED PAYOUTS ARE ADJUSTED UPWARD TO COMPENSATE FOR FOREGONE INTERESTS.
If professional athletes, whose sole aim is larger income are asked to wait for sometime before collecting their salaries, with the promise that their incomes will be raise for the period of their waiting, then, most of them will gladly agree to the arrangement, since, they are sure of higher amounts.

You might be interested in

What is the difference between purpose and objectives in setting goals for future .

Zarrin [17]

Answer: Purpose is something that influences goal. And objective is the specific action which one try to achieve as a short term plan.

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

For high levels of quantity supplied where firms have reached near maximum capacity, supply becomes less elastic because firms m

Alex787 [66]

The answer is that the given statement is True.
When firm has achieved greatest creation limit, firm should make extra speculation to extend generation plants and to accomplish this , firm should build the costs of the item which will influence the supply versatility.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In each of the following cases, calculate the accounting break even and the cash break even points. Ignore any tax effects in ca

mylen [45]

Answer:

Case 1 Accounting break-even point = 13,861 units

Case 1 Cash break-even point = 11,286 units

Case 2 Accounting break-even point = 20,000 units

Case 2 Cash break-even point = 11,875 units

Case 3 Accounting break-even point = 225 units

Case 3 Cash break-even point = 138 units

Explanation:

Break even point refers to the point or sales unit where total cost is equal to total revenue. That is, both total revenue and total cost at the point are even and there neither profit nor loss.

Break even point can be computed for accounting break even and the cash break even points. The difference between the two is that accounting break even point include depreciation in the fixed cost while the cash break even point deduct non cash expenses from the fixed cost. The formula for the are as follows:

Accounting break even point = Fixed cost / (Unit price - Unit cost)

Cash break even point = (Fixed cost - Depreciation) / (Unit price - Unit cost)

Using the two formula for this question, we have:

Case 1 Accounting break even point = $7,000,000 / ($2,800 - $2,295) = $7,000,000 / $505 = 13,861 units

Case 1 Cash break even point = ($7,000,000 - $1,250,000) / ($2,800 - $2,295) = $5,750,000 / $505 = 11,286 units

Case 2 Accounting break even point = $160,000 / (51 - 43) = $160,000 / $8 = 20,000 units

Case 2 Cash break even point = ($160,000 - $65,000) / (51 - 43) = $95,000 / $8 = 11,875 units

Case 3 Accounting break even point = $1,800 / (12 - 4) = $1,800 / $8 = 225 units

Case 3 Cash break even point = ($1,800 - $700) / (12 - 4) = $1,100 / $8 = 138 units

6 0

3 years ago

Nav is the net assets valuation which is the value of the total assets held in a portfolio.

Goryan [66]

If this is true or false, then its true.

6 0

3 years ago

Olivia is a florist who specializes in roses.

Eva8 [605]

Answer:

Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract

Explanation:

1. 1. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Juan?

The most important point of focus from the aspect of the law and statute of frauds is that from the scenario it was stated clearly that ''She has a <u>five-year written contract with Juan to sell him as many roses as he needs for his wedding chapel.</u> ''

Olivier does have sufficient contract rights because she already signed a 5 year contract to supply as many roses as possible to Juan. Juan cannot come at the end of two years and break the contract

2. What contract rights and remedies, if any, does Olivia have against Ann?

The scenario states clearly that ''Ann emailed Olivia an order for <u>"1,000 white stems''</u> and ''Olivia instead sent orchids, the only "white stems" available at the time.''

Hence Olivia fulfilled Ann's orders and Ann has absolutely no case at all. Olivia has acted in accordance to Ann's request and has full rights to claim her payment.

3. What defenses, if any, do Juan and Ann have?

In summary the defenses of both parties are weak

1. Juan has a defense of unforeseen financial difficulties but this will be insufficient to override a written contract

2. Ann assumed that Olivia would send roses but assumption does not work in the eyes of the law but written agreements.

Additionally, Ann could argue that Olivia should have communicated the price of the orchids at the point of processing Ann's orders.

6 0

3 years ago