Answer:
d.All of these choices would reduce risk for your portfolio and therefore show at least some benefit to diversification
Explanation:
Which of the following securities could NOT have any benefits for diversification with your investment portfolio? All of these choices would reduce risk for your portfolio and therefore show at least some benefit to diversification
Answer:
La Boulangerie Bakery,
Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, U.S.A
25th April, 2021
Dear esteemed customers,
I bring to you an unpalatable news about the changes that would be initiated in our business approach to our customers.
As you can bear witness to, there has been a drastic increase in the cost of doing business in our industry with the notable changes being in the wheat used in producing our confectioneries, the sugar as well as the rising cost of transportation to various customers' locations.
Taking this into account, our company decided to introduce a flat rate delivery cost of $20 irrespective of the location of our customers. This would help us to minimize our production cost. Inorder to also consider our customers, there is a free 20 pieces cake (box) offered to every customer who buys 50 box of each product. This means, 50 box of cupcakes earns you one box free, 100 box cupcake purchase earns you 2 free boxes.
I do hope you would understand our challenges as a company and bear with us regarding to this delivery charge introduction.
Sincerely,
Maris Albert (For the company)
Explanation:
Jason, your client, is developing a subdivision of 140 houses. He may place deed restrictions on as many as 140 (100%) properties.
<h3>What is a deed restriction?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the written agreements that are done in order to restrict and limit activities that may go on in a property.
These are private agreements that are made. It has to be 100 percent on the properties.
Read more on deed restrictions here:
brainly.com/question/4510408
#SPJ1
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
