Answer:
i think its B, b ut wait till more people answer it so you can know if im right
Explanation:
Answer:
Dissociative identity disorders
Explanation:
Answer:
Appearance
Explanation:
Appearance, more than any other factor, has occasioned the objectification of aging. This can have serious consequences on people as they age. Some people might become overly concerned with their looks. Women are particularly affected by this phenomenon. Moreover, people might assume that an older apperance comes with certain decline in cognitive or motor skills, even when the person is still healthy and productive.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Trans-theoretical Model or the Stages of Change Model was theorized by DiClimente and Prochaska in 1977. In this model behavioral changes of addicted person is evaluated.
In this model, Prochaska and DiClimente, staged six sequential orders in which behavioral occurs.
<u>The stage in which Adam is in the Preparation or the Determination stage</u>.
Preparation/Determination Stage <u>is the stage in which the person decides to take action within one month. </u>
<u>In the given case, Adam has decided to take action to stop drinking at the beginning of the next month, so it is the preparation stage</u>.
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
