The main purpose of the Bill of Rights is to show the rights of American citizens, to show our liberty. The Bill of Rights protects our basic rights as Americans.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
He ran a federal bank in Maryland.
Okay, this just goes back to the civil war. one difference between the northern and southern was the idea of slavery.
I believe the answer is: <span>arbitrary inference
</span><span>arbitrary inference refers to the process of creating a conclusion without sufficient evidences to back it up.
We can see this arbitary interference by observing marta's thought that believe Demerio is </span><span>older and losing my physical abilities without even seeing him doing the task.</span>
