All categories

3 years ago

What is 1/2 in a decimal form

Mathematics

2 answers:

svetlana [45]3 years ago

4 0

1/2 = 0.5

Solution:

2/1=0.5

Umnica [9.8K]3 years ago

3 0

1/2 as a decimal is 0.5 or .5

You might be interested in

Please explain the problem attached

borishaifa [10]

<h3>Answer:</h3>

F (3x, 3y)

<h3>Explanation:</h3>

Dilation about the origin multiplies each coordinate by the dilation factor. For some coordinates (x, y), dilation by a factor of 3 means the new coordinates are ...

... 3×(x, y) = (3x, 3y)

_____

<em>Comment on the problem</em>

The way the problem is worded, you expect an answer choice that will be specific to the coordinates of point A. There are none.

Instead, the answer choices are generic, corresponding to dilation of a point (x, y) by a factor of 3, translation up and to the right by 3, dilation by a factor of 1/3, and translation down and to the left by 3.

8 0

3 years ago

When the automobile manufacturer releases a new model in its WOW series, it promises that drivers can expect to get mlleage that

bixtya [17]

Answer:

28.4 divided by 6.5

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

A scuba diver descends from the surface at a rate of -38 feet per minute. What is the position of the scuba diver relative to th

lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

-114 (The answer should be negative.)

Step-by-step explanation:

3 x -38 = -114

4 0

1 year ago

Which of the following graphs represents a function

Nata [24]

Where are the graphs? a function is when every input is paired with exactly one output(every x value must have exactly 1 y value). the vertical line test helps determine a function, a vertical line can’t intersect a graph at more then one point, if it does intersect in more then 1 point then it’s not a function

7 0

3 years ago

A rectangular field is 95 meters long and 65 meters wide. Give the length and width of another rectangular field that has the sa

Lena [83]

Answer:

There are a ton of answers. For instance, 1m by 159m.

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for the area is $a=l*w$ , where $l$ and $w$ are constants.

The formula for perimeter is $p=2l+2w$

The question wants another rectangle that has the same perimeter, but a smaller area.

The perimeter of the two fields has to be:

$p=(2*95)+(2*65)\\p=190+130\\p=320$

Thankfully, the question never specified how much smaller the area has to be. So let's go to the logical extreme and make it 1 meter wide. To conserve the perimeter, we'd have to add the removed 64 meters to the original 95 meters of length, resulting in a rectangle with a width of 1m and a length of 159m. This results in an area of exactly 159 $m^{2}$ . The original rectangle had an area of 6175 $m^{2}$ . Mission accomplished!

But why stop there? Let's go even further down this rabbit hole!

Instead of 1, why don't we take it several steps further and use 0.0000001? At that point, the length would end up being 159.9999999m.

The area would be 0.00001599999999 $m^{2}$ .

Let's go further!!

Width: 0.00000000000000000001

Length: 159.99999999999999999999

Area: 0.00000000000000000001599999999999999999999 (approximate).

One more, for old time's sake.

Width: 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001m

Length: 159.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999m

Area: 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000015999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 $m^{2}$

At that point, there's so little area in the plot of land that you could claim it has no area!

5 0

3 years ago