It would be: 6 ( 6- 4)
= 6 ( 2)
= 12
So, Your Answer would be 12
Hope this helps!
Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
There's no reason behind why 2(x +3) = 3x + 3 (or, after distribution, 2x + 6 = 3x +3). This is because the equation is given. Unless it's a word problem, there's never reasoning behind the equation itself, but there's reasoning behind the answer.
However, X is not equal to 3 because, when you substitute 3 in for x on both sides, you get a not true statement. This statement is that the results are equal to each other, which is false. I'll show you how.
2(3+3) = 3(3) +3
2(6) = 3(3) + 3
12 = 9
As you can see, you get that 12 = 9, which, logically, is false. The true answer to the equation is
2(x +3) = 3x +3 (Step One: Distribute the two)
2x +6 = 3x +3 (Step Two: Combine like terms on one side of the equation. If there are none, you can begin combining like terms on other sides of the equation. For this equation, subtract 2x from both sides of the equation, and also subtract three (NOT 3x) from either side.)
3 = x
Wait... I just got the same answer... Hm, there's something wrong here! I think the equation itself is impossible! How strange!
Answer: DescriptionIn mathematical physics, the Yang–Mills existence and mass gap problem is an unsolved problem and one of the seven Millennium Prize Problems defined by the Clay Mathematics Institute, which has offered a prize of US$1,000,000 for its solution. The problem is phrased as follows: Yang–Mills Existence and Mass Gap.
Answer:
y=k*x
plug in the known values of x and y and use them to solve for k
then you can use the new value of k to solve for y when x=40
Step-by-step explanation:
cuz cuz you need it to be directly that's what you need to