Are u talking about kush as in kk
Answer:
Corroborating is comparing a new text to another in order to check the accuracy of the evidence and the plausibility of the claims and reasons. If the two documents agree — either in fact or in reasoning and claims — then the new historical evidence is corroborated by the previous source.
Explanation:
<u><em>BRAINLIEST PLEASE!!!</em></u>
<u>The differences between the British and American forces at the beginning of the revolutionary war:
</u>
The British Forces were seasoned army regulars while the American forces were a guerrilla force. The British had more experience in fighting the Indian Wars and the Anglo-French wars and were better prepared.
The British wore formal uniforms and were battle-ready while the Americans predominantly comprised of peasants, labourers in ragged clothes and hid behind trees or concealed positions. They primarily had the home advantage. They were led by retired servicemen of the British Army who had revolted against the empire.
Germany had been blockaded during the war (the Allies didn't let food and fertilizer through), and many of its citizens were still starving afterward.
As a new democracy, German bureaucracy was rather inefficient.
These problems eventually led to Hitler becoming the leader of Germany (he promised to solve them, and he blamed the Jews for other problems), which led to World War 2.
