I think most scientists would not respect this researchers claim.
It doesn't seem like the researcher followed the steps of the scientific method.
1.) Making an observation.
2.)Asking questions.
3.)Forming a hypothesis.
4.)Conducting an experiment.
5.)Analyzing Data.
6.)Drawing a conclusion.
7.)Showing work to others.
Publishing his/her work would be the very last step after completing everything else.
Answer:
Zero (0)
Explanation:
According to the given information the genotype of the woman with blood type "AB" would by I^AI^B. The genotype of the man with blood type O would be "ii". Here, the alleles I^A and I^B are dominant over the allele "i".
A cross between parents with genotype I^AI^B and ii would give 50% of children with I^Ai genotype and 50% of children with I^Bi genotype. The children with "I^Ai genotype" would have blood type "A" and the children with I^Bi genotype would have blood type "B". This couple is never likely to have any child with blood type "O" since the mother does not carry allele "i".
Cross: I^AI^B x ii = 1/2 I^Ai : 1/2 I^Bi
The concentration of CO2 would drastically increase.
The answer is b, chloroplast.
Yes, I think the cell theory is a scientific theory because its statements are testable and verifiable.
<h3>What is a scientific theory?</h3>
A scientific theory is a well-sustained statement based on different types of scientific evidence.
A scientific theory must be testable, which means that it can be confirmed or rejected by using the scientific method.
In conclusion, the cell theory meets the definition of a scientific theory because it is testable and verifiable.
Learn more about scientific theories here:
brainly.com/question/11555274
brainly.com/question/1594446
#SPJ1
