0
Step-by-step explanation:
for this question is not even possible
Answer:
- There is no significant evidence that p1 is different than p2 at 0.01 significance level.
- 99% confidence interval for p1-p2 is -0.171 ±0.237 that is (−0.408, 0.066)
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p1 be the proportion of the common attribute in population1
And p2 be the proportion of the same common attribute in population2
: p1-p2=0
: p1-p2≠0
Test statistic can be found using the equation:
where
- p1 is the sample proportion of the common attribute in population1 (
)
- p2 is the sample proportion of the common attribute in population2 (
)
- p is the pool proportion of p1 and p2 (
)
- n1 is the sample size of the people from population1 (30)
- n2 is the sample size of the people from population2 (1900)
Then
≈ 2.03
p-value of the test statistic is 0.042>0.01, therefore we fail to reject the null hypothesis. There is no significant evidence that p1 is different than p2.
99% confidence interval estimate for p1-p2 can be calculated using the equation
p1-p2±
where
- z is the z-statistic for the 99% confidence (2.58)
Thus 99% confidence interval is
0.533-0.704±
≈ -0.171 ±0.237 that is (−0.408, 0.066)
-(2y-8)-3(1+x)-7
-10y+40-3(1-x)-7
-10y+40-3-3x-7
-10y+30-3x
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
To find:
- Summation notation of the given series
Summation Notation:

Where n is the number of terms and
is general term.
First, determine what kind of series it is, there are two main series that everyone should know:
A series that has common difference.
A series that has common ratio.
If you notice and keep subtracting the next term with previous term:
Two common difference, we can in fact say that the series is arithmetic one. Since we know the type of series, we have to find the number of terms.
Now that brings us to arithmetic sequence, we know that first term is 5 and last term is 251, we’ll be finding both general term and number of term using arithmetic sequence:
<u>Arithmetic Sequence</u>

Where
is the nth term,
is the first term and
is the common difference:
So for our general term:

And for number of terms, substitute
= 251 and solve for n:

Now we can convert the series to summation notation as given the formula above, substitute as we get:
