Answer:
A. both Jonathan's and Joanna's cases
Explanation:
Legal implication: The term "legal implication" is described as a phenomenon that is considered as the consequences or results in which an individual in being involved something inappropriate according to the specific law. Legal implications can either be negative or positive.
Ethical implication: The term "ethical implication" is described as a phenomenon in which various matter is being considered based on an ethical viewpoint. It is considered as the human principle based on wrong and right.
In the question above, the correct answer is A.
Answer:
They kept control of a railroad junction
Explanation:
This link of railroad acted almost as a tether from which both Confederate armies could support one another at will. In this particular case, Johnston was actually able to use the railroad to move his troops to the aide of Beauregard as we read earlier, helping sway the tide of battle in the South's favor.
Answer:
You can consult Jschlatt about this topic, but until then I think I'll do.
Explanation:
In general, they don't care. That's why it's a sweatshop and not a normal business. The employers are typically in it for the money, which is why the conditions are so unideal (understatement). Someone who valued human life wouldn't force underpaid, malnourished children (or adults for that matter) to work in such horrible circumstances.
One power that the federal court system does not have is appointing federal judges to the bench.
<h3>What power does the federal court system not have?</h3>
The federal court system does not have the power to appoint its own federal judges to the bench.
This power belongs to the President of the United States who nominates judges who the Senate then confirms.
Find out more on the federal court system at brainly.com/question/1298199.
#SPJ1
