Answer:
#1 to get the information
#2 tells the what they need to know
#3 tells the people what they need to know
Explanation:
Answer:One of the most hotly debated clauses in the Constitution deals with the removal of federal government officials through the impeachment process. But what did the Founders who crafted that language think about the process and its overall intention?
George MasonThe need for the ultimate check, and in particular the removal of the President, in a system of checks and balances was brought up early at the 1787 convention in Philadelphia. Constitutional heavyweights such as James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, James Wilson and Gouverneur Morris debated the Impeachment Clause at the convention, and Alexander Hamilton argued for it in The Federalist after the convention.
Today, impeachment remains as a rarely used process to potentially remove the “President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States” if Congress finds them guilty of “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
Explanation:
The reason is because birth control is less expensive and easier for teens to get in many
other developed countries than in the United States. And teachers,
parents and physicians tend to be more accepting of teenage sexuality
and more likely to encourage use of contraception, said Sarah Brown,
chief executive of the Washington, D.C.-based National Campaign to
Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.
Answer and Explanation:
1. Prosecutors may claim that the inaccurate report to which Rachel had access could induce misinterpretation on her part and that, in any case, Peter was already on the police for vandalism, which contributed to Rachel's conclusion. These justifications would not be successful, because Rachel had many ways to find out what actually happened to Peter.
2. Peter would sue Rachel for defamation and would likely succeed, as he has several witnesses that Rachel released incorrect information and that it affects his reputation.
3. The current malice is necessary in this case because Peter is a very well-known and popular person, and it is important that the current malice is inserted in the case, to speed up the process.
4. The fair report privilege can be used to protect Rachel, since the false information about Peter that she exposed, had as its only source a public document that induced her to publish the defamation.
Answer:
The Right to Information Act gives citizens the right to ask for information and decide, based on the information received, whether their constitutional rights have been met. This law arms individuals with information so that they can advocate for themselves.
