I think just a trapezoid no others
Hope I helped, Good luck
= )
First of all, the modular inverse of n modulo k can only exist if GCD(n, k) = 1.
We have
130 = 2 • 5 • 13
231 = 3 • 7 • 11
so n must be free of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13, which are the first six primes. It follows that n = 17 must the least integer that satisfies the conditions.
To verify the claim, we try to solve the system of congruences

Use the Euclidean algorithm to express 1 as a linear combination of 130 and 17:
130 = 7 • 17 + 11
17 = 1 • 11 + 6
11 = 1 • 6 + 5
6 = 1 • 5 + 1
⇒ 1 = 23 • 17 - 3 • 130
Then
23 • 17 - 3 • 130 ≡ 23 • 17 ≡ 1 (mod 130)
so that x = 23.
Repeat for 231 and 17:
231 = 13 • 17 + 10
17 = 1 • 10 + 7
10 = 1 • 7 + 3
7 = 2 • 3 + 1
⇒ 1 = 68 • 17 - 5 • 231
Then
68 • 17 - 5 • 231 ≡ = 68 • 17 ≡ 1 (mod 231)
so that y = 68.
Answer:
<em>Number of Other flavor candy is 84.</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that
A total of 560 pieces of candy are there in the box.
of the pieces are fruity.
Number of Fruity pieces:

Now, remaining pieces = Total pieces - Fruity pieces
remaining pieces = 560 - 448 = 112
Also given that
of the remaining pieces are mind.
Number of mint pieces:

Other flavors remaining = Total pieces - Fruity pieces - Mint pieces
Other flavors remaining = 560 - 448 - 28
Other flavors remaining = 112 - 28 = <em>84</em>
<em>Number of Other flavor candy is 84.</em>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
the sum of -4.82 and 4.35 = -0.47
so a is correct
the product of -4.82 and 4.35 = -20.967
so b is incorrect
the quotient of -4.82 and -4.35 is 1.10804597701
the quotient of 4.82 and 4.35 is 1.10804597701
so c is correct
if we subtract 4.35 from -4.82 we get -9.17
so d is incorrect
Hope This Helps!!!