Answer:
d
Explanation:
the farther you are from the equater the dolder it is.
Answer:
B. 111 J
Explanation:
The change in internal energy is the sum of the heat absorbed and the work done on the system:
ΔU = Q + W
At constant pressure, work is:
W = P ΔV
Given:
P = 0.5 atm = 50662.5 Pa
ΔV = 4 L − 2L = 2 L = 0.002 m³
Plugging in:
W = (50662.5 Pa) (0.002 m³)
W = 101.325 J
Therefore:
ΔU = 10 J + 101.325 J
ΔU = 111.325 J
Rounded to three significant figures, the change in internal energy is 111 J.
Ummmm this one is hard but i guess it would be t?????
Answer:
Constellations Changing Positions!!!! :D <----(smiley face)
Explanation:
Due to the earth's rotation, stars appear to move. As the Earth rotates from west to east, the stars appear to rise in the East, moving across south to set in the west. The Sun will appear to move through the stars, making one complete circuit of the sky in 365 days!!
(yes i'm literally 9+6 years old and idek why i'm doing this XD )
A source of error is any factor that may affect the outcome of an experiment. There are countless conceivable sources of error in any experiment; you want to focus on the factors that matter most. Identify each source of error specifically and then explain how that source of error would have affected the results. Keep in mind that an "error" to a scientist does not mean "mistake"; it more closely means "uncertainty".
Many students are tempted to say "human error", but this term is vague and lazy; any decent teacher will not accept it. Instead, think about specific things that happened during the lab exercise where the end results may have been affected.
To give an example one might find in a bio lab: perhaps a water bath's temperature was not monitored very carefully and you found that an enzyme's activity was greater than you expected. In that case, you could write something like,
"The temperature of the water bath during this exercise was not monitored carefully. It is possible that it was warmer or cooler than intended, and this would have affected the enzyme activity accordingly. The fact that our enzyme activity was found to be higher than expected leads me to believe that perhaps the water bath was too warm."
