1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
balu736 [363]
3 years ago
14

Why is there no one clear definition for a political conservative? Conservatives do not want to be defined Conservatives are too

complex to define Conservatives may have differing views on many issues Democrats argue there is no clear definition
History
2 answers:
AnnyKZ [126]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is C) conservatives may have different views on many issues.

<em>The reason that there is no clear definition for a political conservative is that conservatives may have different views on many issues. </em>

Although we can identify conservative people or parties, sometimes there is no clear definition of them because they have many different views, depending on the issue at hand. Generally speaking, a conservative person is one who is very traditional, he/she opposes to high taxes to finance social programs, they opposed labor unions, they do not like government regulation and have a patriotic sense.

murzikaleks [220]3 years ago
5 0

There is no clear definition for a conservative politician because conservatism can not be understood in itself, it is the expression of something deeper that determines it.

A conservative is by definition not a stupid or selfish person. Instead, it is someone who believes there is something worth saving in our lives. In fact, conservatism is a word with an old and honored meaning - but a meaning almost forgotten by Americans until recent times. Abrahan Lincoln wanted to be recognized as a conservative.

You might be interested in
Who were the Maya people?​
Karolina [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Maya people are people who lived in Mexico, they developed calendar systems and hieroglyphic writings.

7 0
3 years ago
Why is Attila the Hun a controversial historical figure?
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

D. Historians believe that he is a myth rather than a real historical person.

Explanation:

Attila the Hun Attila the Hun (405-453), also sometimes known with the nickname as Attila the Scourge of God (Flagellum Dei) or simply Attila was the most powerful king of the Huns. He reigned over what was then Europe's largest empire, from 434 until his death. His empire stretched from Germany and the Netherlands to the Ural river and from the Danube River to Poland and Estonia. During his rule, he was among the most dire of the Western and Eastern Roman Empire's enemies: he invaded the Balkans twice and besieged Constantinople in the second invasion; he marched through Gaul (modern day France) as far as Orleans before being defeated at the Battle of Chalons; and he drove the western emperor Valentinian III from his capital at Ravenna in 452. He was regarded as sacker of cities. In the year 453 Attilla was at his wedding party,got drunk,hit his head,and chocked on his own blood this is how Attilla died a terrible and unfair death.

Hope this helps ;)

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think the rebirth or Rome happened in Italy?
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

A popular explanation for the Italian Renaissance is the thesis that the primary impetus of the early Renaissance was the long-running series of wars between Florence and Milan, whereby the leading figures of Florence rallied the people by presenting the war as one between the free republic and a despotic monarchy.

Explanation:

do not copy and paste that called plagiarism

4 0
3 years ago
Why did Americans believe that the compromise of 1850 resolved divisions over enslavement
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

the Fugitive Slave Act was amended and the slave trade in Washington, D.C., was abolished. Furthermore, California entered the Union as a free state and a territorial government was created in Utah. However, The Compromise of 1850 overturned the Missouri Compromise and left the overall issue of slavery unsettled.

3 0
2 years ago
Definition of pre colonial African societies
Zarrin [17]

The Definition of pre colonial African societies


In Africa there is referred to as acephalous (or state-less) societies. meaning they are not under any political authorty.


I hope this helps :)

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement describes the expansion of Islam under the umayyads
    8·2 answers
  • In order to win the presidential election, a candidate must have the majority of what vote? A) popular B) electoral college C) s
    8·2 answers
  •  Write a letter, as a british government official during the industrial revolution, to an official in a nonindustrial nation ex
    6·2 answers
  • After the fall of the Roman Empire,Europe was broken up into Barbarian kingdom.true or false
    8·1 answer
  • Define the term historical interpretation
    6·1 answer
  • Did the United States actually join the League of Nations?
    15·2 answers
  • Who can reject presidential nominations to the Supreme Court
    11·2 answers
  • 33. The states have the power to establish public schools
    10·1 answer
  • How did the economic reforms of the Meiji government affect Japan? Choose four correct answers.
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how women got the right to vote in Canada. Do you agree with the situation or reasons why some women were given the oppo
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!