Answer:
1.) The internal controls which were missing are from the separation of responsibilities. There must have been in place an inner regulator were an individual works with advisers while alternative individual or unit take-care of the expense procedure, then somebody else allow expenses and then office should distribute the expenditures. There is an absence of inner controls as you can realize that the corporation amalgamated with a larger corporation and no one measured other accounts such as Jackson and company any longer.
2.) With the lack of control, this offered Helen the chance to effect the fraud. With this presence said, she was talented to emulate sign receipts and spend the retailer’s expenditures. She were also the one in responsibility of office the initial and final of accounts. In short, she had several accountabilities that should have remained separated up better and had diverse individuals for the separations of the job. In addition, she needed a bank description from the corporation where she was capable to put the expenditures and pay individual expenditures.
3.) The method this fraud might be noticed is the inspection squad can ask the bank for reports. They might also conference sellers. The accounting section should have ended sure they were doing the due diligence in dealers and corresponding the receipts with statements and expenditures.
$250
COVERAGE LIMIT-DEDUCTIBLE = $4000-$1500 = 2500
$2500/10 = $250
Answer:
Growth Rate = 5.73%
Explanation:
The present value of stock formula can be used here to solve this problem.
The formula is:
Where
is the current stock price
is the dividend to be paid next year
r is the rate of return required
g is the growth rate expected
Now, the first 3 variables are given, we need to find g. Substituting, we find our answer:
In percentage, it is
<u>Growth Rate = 5.73%</u>
Answer: C. Firm A reduces the price to $7 causing Firm B to reduce its price to $4.50.
Explanation:
Since firm A is impatient to earn more profits and Firm B wishes to last in the business for the long-run, then Firm A will reduce the price to $7 causing Firm B to reduce its price to $4.50.
Since Firm A reduces the price to $7, this will lead to an increase in the quantity demanded of the product and therefore the firm can earn more profit. On the other hand, firm B will reduce its price to a point where the price meets the marginal cost which is $4.50.
Answer:
The 500-acre area is scarce because it has alternative uses: preservation in its natural state or a site for homes. A choice must be made between these uses. The opportunity cost of preserving the land in its natural state is the forgone value of the land as a housing development. The opportunity cost of using the land as a housing development is the forgone value of preserving the land.
Explanation:
