Answer:
the calculations and their justification are found in the explanation section.
Explanation:
The average transmissivity is
![T=\frac{Q_{w} }{2\pi (s_{1}-s_{2} ) } ln(\frac{r_{2} }{r_{1} } )](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=T%3D%5Cfrac%7BQ_%7Bw%7D%20%7D%7B2%5Cpi%20%28s_%7B1%7D-s_%7B2%7D%20%29%20%7D%20ln%28%5Cfrac%7Br_%7B2%7D%20%7D%7Br_%7B1%7D%20%7D%20%29)
Qw = pumping rate = 400 L/s = 400000 m³/s
s₁ = drawdown of the well = 1 m
s₂ = 0.5 m
r₁ = piezometric level = 50 m
r₂ = 100 m
Replacing values
![T=\frac{400000}{2\pi (1-0.5)} ln(\frac{100}{50} )=88254.24m^{2} /s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=T%3D%5Cfrac%7B400000%7D%7B2%5Cpi%20%281-0.5%29%7D%20ln%28%5Cfrac%7B100%7D%7B50%7D%20%29%3D88254.24m%5E%7B2%7D%20%2Fs)
the hydraulic conductivity is
![K=\frac{T}{b}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%3D%5Cfrac%7BT%7D%7Bb%7D)
b = thickness = 24 m
Replacing
![K=\frac{88254.24}{24} =3677.26m/s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%3D%5Cfrac%7B88254.24%7D%7B24%7D%20%3D3677.26m%2Fs)
no steady state for this drawdown.
The radial distance is
![s=s_{w} -\frac{Q_{w} }{2\pi T} ln(\frac{r}{r_{w} } )](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=s%3Ds_%7Bw%7D%20-%5Cfrac%7BQ_%7Bw%7D%20%7D%7B2%5Cpi%20T%7D%20ln%28%5Cfrac%7Br%7D%7Br_%7Bw%7D%20%7D%20%29)
here
sw = 4 m = drawdown at the pumping well
s =drawdown of the radial distance = 0
rw = radius of the pumping well = 0.5
Clearing r
![0=4-\frac{400000}{2\pi *88254.24 } ln(\frac{r}{0.5} )\\4=0.721(lnr+ln0.5)\\r=exp(\frac{3.5}{0.721} )=128.3m](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=0%3D4-%5Cfrac%7B400000%7D%7B2%5Cpi%20%2A88254.24%20%7D%20ln%28%5Cfrac%7Br%7D%7B0.5%7D%20%29%5C%5C4%3D0.721%28lnr%2Bln0.5%29%5C%5Cr%3Dexp%28%5Cfrac%7B3.5%7D%7B0.721%7D%20%29%3D128.3m)
It can be said that the steady state reduction is not valid at a distance beyond that calculated because the reduction would become negative.