Struck down laws created by the Georgia legislature to seize Cherokee lands.
Further Explanation:
Worcester v. Georgia was the case of 1832 of the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Renounce the conviction of Worcester. Supreme Court also held that any land of America without the license by the state to be considered as unconstitutional. It built up doctrine of tribal sovereignty. The ruling laid out a strong relationship between the Indian nations and the USA. John Marshall said that the character of the USA government is federal. Indian states would not be given any authority in the American Indian affairs. Thus Georgia statute is unconstitutional. The ruling was given to avoid the political conflict of the court and the executive. The ruling had ordered for Worcester to be free and they complied to the order several months later. Later in 1833 the new governor Wilson Lumpkin gave the order to pardon Worcester if they stop their activities in the Cherokee. Worcester and Butler complied to the order and they both were set free. Worcester came to the Indian Territory when Cherokee removal was on trial in 1836. Worcester joined his ministry back and translated the bible backing to Cherokee. The first printing press was established in the USA that worked with Cherokee for publishing the newspaper. There are several treaties between the USA government and the Cherokee.
Learn more:
1. Compare and contrast lifestyle choices that positively affect physical fitness with those that negatively affect physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/951060
</u>
2. Discuss why a physically active job does not guarantee better physical fitness.
<u>brainly.com/question/1617174
</u>
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Chapter: Supreme Court case Worcester v. Georgia
Subject: Social Science
Keywords: Conviction, license, unconstitutional, American Indian affairs, political conflict, new governor, Wilson Lumpkin, first printing press.
Anxiety, loneliness, fear...... etc !
Answer:
1. In this case, parents yell at the boy to do the dishes due to frustration with a refusal of their request. It is a negative reinforcement as the boy did the dishes after yelling by the parents to avoid yelled at by parents again
2. Boy's poor work in washing the dishes is noticed by the mother to avoid the unpleasant work mother relived him from the job he was assigned which strengthen behavior of the boy of doing his jobs poorly which is again a negative reinforcement.
3. Negative reinforcement to force the boy to do the dishes leads to a poor job from the side of the boy. To avoid this parents must apply negative reinforcement by stoping pocket money, Tv time, or other things.
The different schedules of reinforcement that the question is asking about are: Fixed ratio, f<span>ixed interval, variable ratio and variable interval.
Those are the four different intervals in conditioning that are usually mentioned.
Those which are "fixed" will be someohow regular, but we can see here that this is not the case here: she cannot expect some regularity in her acceptance rate, as every decision is independent of the other magazine's decisions.
Now it will be variable ratio - the more she submits, the bigger the chance, but at an unpredictable ratio. It won't be variable interval, since time is not relevant here, only the more
</span>