if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
Answer:
it's not 16/,13 ; )
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Rocco payes $292.28
Step-by-step explanation:
Because it is an increase so you put 104% over 100% in fraction form and then you put 282 at the bottom of another part of a fraction then you do 100 divided by 282 and you get 2.82 so then you take that 2.82 and you multiply it by 104% and you get 292.28 you can use a calculator to check but i know i did it correctly
I hope this helps you
f (1+1)= f (1)+8
f (2)= 27+8
f (2)=35
f (2+1)= f (2)+8
f (3)= 35+8
f (3)=43
