Answer: C
Explanation:In economics, a backward-bending supply curve of labour, or backward-bending labour supply curve, is a graphical device showing a situation in which as real (inflation-corrected) wages increase beyond a certain level, people will substitute leisure (non-paid time) for paid worktime and so higher wages lead to a decrease in the labour supply and so less labour-time being offered for sale.[1]
The "labour-leisure" tradeoff is the tradeoff faced by wage-earning human beings between the amount of time spent engaged in wage-paying work (assumed to be unpleasant) and satisfaction-generating unpaid time, which allows participation in "leisure" activities and the use of time to do necessary self-maintenance, such as sleep. The key to the tradeoff is a comparison between the wage received from each hour of working and the amount of satisfaction generated by the use of unpaid time.
Such a comparison generally means that a higher wage entices people to spend more time working for pay; the substitution effect implies a positively sloped labour supply curve. However, the backward-bending labour supply curve occurs when an even higher wage actually entices people to work less and consume more leisure or unpaid time.
Answer:
they are easier to manipulate and trick
Answer:
FALSE
Explanation:
When a stream ends to become stable by continuously eroding as well as depositing the material in its channels and in the near by low lying areas, it is known as its grade.
After grading the stream forms an Oxbow.
Thus the answer is FALSE.
We've got to differentiate first afforestation to reforestation. The former is planting trees in areas where there is no sign or trace of plants or seedlings before. It's like your making a new environment by your own. The latter is replacing or bringing back what was taken before.
Answer:
D. she blamed his fall on his being clumsy
Explanation:
Fundamental attribution error is a term in social psychology which describes how individual, judges people's actions, by giving too much causal weight to the character of people involved, rather than to the circumstances in which those people acted.
It is often known as correspondence bias or attribution effect.
In other words, it is the defined as the tendency for individual to put much emphasis on dispositional and personality-based explanations on actions of people, while putting less empahsis on situational explanations for actions obeserved from the people's behavior or action.
Hence, in this case, Leila is blaming the man's fall on being clumsy, rather than acknowledging the fact that his fall is due to walking on a patch of ice.
