Answer:
Proportion of sales of each department.
Explanation:
Advertising expense directly effects the sales of the business. As the campaign is made store-wide sales and it does not directly traceable to any specific department. It need proper basis for allocation of expenses. The proportion of sales of each department is the most suitable basis from all of the given options because the share of benefit from the campaign is received in the form of sale. A campaign might mostly effects the sales.
Answer:
Product warrant liability to be reported as on 31.12.2021* is $3.124
<em>*The procedures are attached in a microsof excel document. </em>
Explanation:
This amount will be recognized as a liability only if product warranty amount can be rmeasured reliabily and there is probability that there will be an outflow of funds.
<h2>TJ Maxx wanted to minimize <u>brand cannibalization</u></h2>
Explanation:
A) microtargeting
: Micro targeting is basically a marketing strategy to identify the need of the people using "data-mining" technique. Normally used by politicians to get people interest during the time of election.
B) brand cannibalization
: It is the reduction of one product due to the release of another new product. TJ Maxx is interested more on people visiting more to shops than online.
C) retail mixing
: It constitutes of 6 “P's”. They are presentation, personnel, product, place, promotion, price.
D) retail channel omnification: Activities pertaining to the direct marketing are termed as retail channel omnification.
Answer:
They may put a firm at a competitive advantage to indigenous competitors
Explanation:
Trade barriers is when the government put up barriers to import. The goal of this is to increase local production of goods and services.
Trade barriers can be in the form of quotas or import taxes
Trade barriers makes the import of goods more expensive and this discourages imports
Answer:
The Pandemic has made chicken more expensive, in order to offset this effect to consumers, government subsidized the price of chickens by a per-unit subsidy. If it wants to study the substitution effect of this subsidy, the government should imposed a Lump-sum tax.
False
Explanation:
The government should have imposed a lump-sum subsidy if it really wanted to study the substitution effect of the subsidy instead of imposing a lump-sum tax. This subsidy should be granted to chicken farmers to reduce their production costs, which will in turn reduce the cost of chicken to the consumers. A lump-sum tax sounds like a contradictory effort to offset the high cost of chicken on the consumers.
