Is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.
Answer:
No impact.
Explanation:
In some countries, states do not have the autonomy to formulate their own laws. The US is not one of those. In the state territory, although there are laws that apply throughout the country, each state can formulate its own laws and these must be followed within the limits of the state and punishable by those who disobey. The law of each state must be judged in its home state and cannot be imposed on another state that does not accept that law as the rule to be followed. Thus, in relation to the above question, we can conclude that if state law in the neighboring state requires that interrogation be recorded on video, that law has no impact on state interrogation that does not require such recording.
I believe the answer is: <span>British expeditionary force
</span><span>British expeditionary force was a group of soldiers that created in world war 2 in order to help the fight against nazi in the western front.
At that time, The French surrendered to the nazi only within 30 days the nazi's initial attack and the </span><span>British expeditionary force was sent there to help its ally. But the nazi's forces got the better of them in the combat and they're forced to escape from Dunkirk.</span>
Answer:
Evans's specialty field is probably <u>humanistic psychology</u>.
Explanation:
Humanistic psychology considers the individual as a whole and is a field concerned with <u>people's motivation to reach their full potential and self actualization, through growth, freewill, creativity and self direction.</u>
Based on the content of Dr Evan's article, his field is most likely humanistic psychology.
Answer:
SI !!!
Explanation:
Hmu sometime?? lol Hope this helps!!!
