The statements most accurately describes the requirement for the documentation of minors' assent to participate in research is <span>Federal regulations do not require the documentation of minors' assent.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Hirschi's social control theory is of the opinion that when an individual has strong ties to family, friends, school and other areas of the society, this reduces his inclination to deviant behavior. In this regard, it is therefore possible for everyone in the society to commit crimes. However, crime is avoided by those who maintain social bonds and family ties. Hence, once a ties are broken, the individual begins to commit crimes without any fear of consequence.
Long-term assets are the term capital mean in the context of making capital expenditure decisions
Funds used by a business to purchase, improve, and maintain tangible assets including land, buildings, machinery, plants, and other property are known as capital expenditures. Capital expenditures is frequently utilized by businesses to launch new initiatives or investments. Repairing a roof (if it extends the usable life of the roof), buying equipment, or constructing a new factory are all examples of capital expenditures on fixed assets. These kinds of financial investments are made by businesses to broaden the scope of their activities or to provide some potential economic benefit.
Capital expenditures are payments made for products or services that are recorded or capitalized on a business's balance sheet as opposed to being deducted from earnings.
Learn more about Capital expenditures here
brainly.com/question/16001079
#SPJ4
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
