All categories

2 years ago

Marty ate 1/4 of his pizza and Luis ate 1/3 of his pizza. Marty ate more pizza than Luis. Is that possible?

2 answers:

8 0

Of course.

You can only say for sure that 1/4 of a whole thing is less than 1/3 of a whole thing
if the whole things are equal size.

If Marty's pizza was 1/3 bigger than Luis' pizza, then they both ate the same amount.
If Marty's was MORE than 1/3 bigger than Luis', then Marty ate more pizza.

madam [21]2 years ago

8 0

Yes, it is possible depending of the size of their pizza.

You might be interested in

Which of the following correlation coefficients represents the strongest

erik [133]

Answer:

$\boxed {\boxed {\sf -0.92}}$

Step-by-step explanation:

A correlation coefficient is a number ranging from -1 and 1 that measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship.

If it is a negative number, the linear relationship is also negative. If it's positive, the relationship is positive.
The closer it is to -1 or 1, the stronger the relationship.

Since the question only asks for the strongest relationship and does not ask for the direction (positive/negative), we can simply choose the number closest to -1/1. Therefore, the answer is -0.92.

8 0

2 years ago

On the playground the teacher observed bicycles and tricycles. she counted 72 wheels and 28 total cycles. How many of them were

Andreyy89

Answer:

16 tricycles

12 bicycles

Step-by-step explanation:

If all were bicycles, there would be 28·2 = 56 wheels. Each additional wheel indicates the presence of a tricycle instead of a bicycle.

There are 72 -56 = 16 tricycles. The remaining 28-16 = 12 are bicycles.

3 0

3 years ago

Please look at the image

alina1380 [7]

Answer:

$r \geqslant - 5$

Step-by-step explanation:

$50 - 4r \leqslant 70$

$- 4r \leqslant 20$

$\frac{ - 4r}{ - 4} \geqslant \frac{20}{ - 4}$

$r \geqslant - 5$

8 0

2 years ago

What is the product?

marysya [2.9K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

PLEASE help. The problem is to find the indicated sum.

alukav5142 [94]

The indicated sum is 350. The answer is 350 because the E or sigma is making you do (6j+2) ten times. Every time you do 6j+2 you start with j as 1 and add a 1 to j for every time you add. For example, [6(1)+2]+[6(2)+2]+[6(3)+2]...[6(10)+2].

Hope this helps.

8 0

2 years ago