hihi :)
the answer is 2, which is health
Variants on two approaches to the concept of health have dominated the philosophy of medicine, here referred to as 'reductionist' and 'relativist'. These two approaches share the basic assumption that the concept of health cannot be both based on an empirical biological foundation and be evaluative and thus adopt either the view that it is 'objective' or evaluative. It is here argued that there is a subset of value concepts that are formed in recognition of certain fundamental facts about living organisms, among which is the concept of health. These are not yet moral concepts, but they are 'normative' or 'evaluative'. The view is defended that health, so understood, is a fundamental concept in the process of medical diagnosis and treatment.
I don’t think you want your health being evaluated by a bunch of high schoolers.
If you’re concerned ask your doctor.
Total calories so that people can know what they want to ingest
Answer:
is a blind, neutral experiment
Explanation:
In Science, to have results in which you can trust, always need to be a comparative ( in this case the creatinine supplementation and the other powder). To be a serious experiment, need to have the same activities, duration and the participants need to "blind" to know which substance they are really taking, so they need to train as usual, and after some time the results will show if there is a significant difference.