You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Answer:
77.6m (3 s.f.)
Step-by-step explanation:
Please see the attached pictures for full solution.
Answer:
First Graph: the function is symmetrical around y axis -> Even
Second Graph: the function is neither
Answer:
9*(6+7)
Step-by-step explanation:
First, we have to find the Greatest Common Factor (GCF), to do this we have to see all the factors of 54 and 63 and find the greatest factor that they have in common.
Factors of 54
1,2,3,6,9,18,27,54
Factors of 63
1,3,7,9,21,63
The GCF is 9 because is the greatest factor that is common to both numbers.
Now we have to divide 54/9 and 63/9
54/9 = 6
63/9 = 7
So now we can write the product of the GCF and another sum:
9*(6+7)
<em>We can prove this by solving both expressions:</em>
<em>54+63 = 9*(6+7)</em>
<em>117 = 9*13</em>
<em>117 = 117 </em>
<em>The results are equal so we prove it is right.</em>
