Gross monthly income:$1,125
Monthly Federal income tax (11.6%): $130.50
Monthly Social security (FICA) (6.2%): $69.75
Monthly Medicare (1.45%): $16.3125
Monthly State Tax (4%): $45
Monthly Local Tax (0.1%): $1.125
Total Monthly deductions $262.6875
Trey’s NMI $862.3125
Explanation:
Calculation for What is his monthly taxes
First step is to calculate the Gross monthly income
Using this formula
Gross monthly income=Annual salary/Numbers of months in a year
Let plug in the formula
Gross monthly income=$13,500/12 months
Gross monthly income=$1,125
Therefore the Gross monthly income is :$1,125
Monthly Federal income tax (11.6%): $130.50
($1,125*11.6%)
Monthly Social security (FICA) (6.2%): $69.75
($1,125*6.2%)
Monthly Medicare (1.45%): $16.3125
($1,125*1.45%)
Monthly State Tax (4%): $45
($1,125*4%)
Monthly Local Tax (0.1%): $1.125
($1,125*0.1%)
Total Monthly deductions $262.6875
($130.50+$69.75+$16.3125+$45+$1.125)
Trey’s NMI $862.3125
Trey’s NMI=Gross monthly income-Total Monthly deductions
Trey’s NMI=$1,125-$262.6875
Trey’s NMI=$862.3125
Therefore his monthly taxes are:
Gross monthly income:$1,125
Monthly Federal income tax (11.6%): $130.50
Monthly Social security (FICA) (6.2%): $69.75
Monthly Medicare (1.45%): $16.3125
Monthly State Tax (4%): $45
Monthly Local Tax (0.1%): $1.125
Total Monthly deductions $262.6875
Trey’s NMI $862.3125
Answer:
Increase of he cost of living VS stagnaition of income
Explanation:
Having a fixed income that is not adjusted by inflation affects the quality of living as year by year the cost of goods and services will rise but the income will remain the same. Therefore it is a matter of time until the income wont be enough to pay all the expenses and costs.
Answer:
$200,000
Explanation:
Selling price per unit = $60.00
Contribution margin per unit = $45.00
Total fixed costs = $150,000
Tax rate = 30%
Contribution margin ratio = Contribution margin ÷ Selling price
= $45 ÷ $60
= 0.75
Hence,
Break-even point =Total Fixed costs ÷ Contribution margin ratio
= 150,000 ÷ 0.75
= $200,000
Answer:
The best way to find terms of trade that will ensure that two entities are in the best terms of trade will be to look at the opportunity costs of the various products they produce.
A high opportunity cost in one product relative to that of the other entity means the entity with the higher opportunity cost should be trading with the entity with the lower opportunity cost and vice versa.
For example, assume that an entity "A" produces both rice and beans whilst an entity "B" also produces rice and beans too.
If the opportunity cost to A of producing Beans is 300 bags of rice whilst the opportunity cost to B of producing Beans is 120 bags of rice, and the opportunity cost to A of producing rice is 180 bags of beans whilst it is 250 bags of beans to B, the principles of comparative advantage require that A should focus more on producing rice and purchase beans from B whilst B should focus more on producing beans and purchase rice from A.
Cheers!