Show them the affects of what would happen if they didn’t take responsibility, eg struggles of obesity etc, hope this helps :)
Answer:
Nonviolence
Explanation:
<u>Nonviolent resistance is a way of protest and social action that relies on the acts of civil disobedience and political noncooperation that do not include any violent act.</u>
<u></u>
Gandhi's salt march is one of the more famous examples. It was the nonviolent resistance that urged for India’s independence and against the colonial rule of the British monarchy. In 1930 the British government introduced taxes on Indian salt and strengthen their monopoly by prohibiting Indians to collect and sell salt. <u>Gandhi and his followers started daily marches during which they symbolically carried salt that has symbolically been picked up from the beach, thus breaking the rule.</u>
<u />
Similarly, the Civil rights movement has been fighting racist laws and ideas against African Americans during the 60s in the US.<u> </u><u>The African-American community showed their resistance by breaking segregation laws with bus boycotts and freedom rides, as well as participating in non-violent sit-ins, marches, and demonstrations. </u>
Loyalty. They pledged oaths of loyalty to their leader.
Progressives are experts in such linguistic deeds. And while conservatives and even libertarians too, and unfortunately, use several trivial phrases instead of solid arguments, progressives are the undefeated champions in this regard. The best proof of this is the very progressive term they use so excessively: when they refer to a measure they support, it is progressive; when they oppose something, it is reactionary.
This simple dichotomy is an enormous pleasure for those individuals incapable of a more elaborate reasoning and who like to see their beliefs summarized in simple buzzwords, almost always partisan and rudimentary.
Walter Rauschenbusch was a theologian focused on the social responsibility of Christians, having challenged churches to get involved in topics such as industrialization, poverty, unemployment, justice and criminality. He insisted that the gospel cannot be alienated from the social consequences of faith.