Answer:
The other side was decreased to approximately .89 times its original size, meaning it was reduced by approximately 11%
Step-by-step explanation:
We can start with the basic equation for the area of a rectangle:
l × w = a
And now express the changes described above as an equation, using "p" as the amount that the width is changed:
(l × 1.1) × (w × p) = a × .98
Now let's rearrange both of those equations to solve for a / l. Starting with the first and easiest:
w = a/l
now the second one:
1.1l × wp = 0.98a
wp = 0.98a / 1.1l
1.1 wp / 0.98 = a/l
Now with both of those equalling a/l, we can equate them:
1.1 wp / 0.98 = w
We can then divide both sides by w, eliminating it
1.1wp / 0.98w = w/w
1.1p / 0.98 = 1
And solve for p
1.1p = 0.98
p = 0.98 / 1.1
p ≈ 0.89
So the width is scaled by approximately 89%
We can double check that too. Let's multiply that by the scaled length and see if we get the two percent decrease:
.89 × 1.1 = 0.979
That should be 0.98, and we're close enough. That difference of 1/1000 is due to rounding the 0.98 / 1.1 to .89. The actual result of that fraction is 0.89090909... if we multiply that by 1.1, we get exactly .98.
Answer:
Integer and Rational Number
Step-by-step explanation:
Natural numbers are positive numbers starting at 1 and going onward. Since -8.0 is not a positive number, it is not a natural number.
Whole numbers are natural numbers and 0 altogether. -8 is not greater than zero or positive, so it is not a whole number.
A rational number is a number that can be expressed as the quotient or fraction p/q of two integers, a numerator p and a non-zero denominator q. Since q may be equal to 1, every integer is a rational number. -8.0 can also be written as -8/1, so it is a rational number and an integer, since every integer is a number over 1 and also a rational number.
the question in English
Mateo will reproduce a photo measuring 5 cm per side on a scale of 3/4
How much will the square side of the copy measure?
Will the size of the copy be larger or smaller than the original?
we know that
the scale factor is equal to 
Let
x----------> the original length side
y--------> the copy length side

we have that

substitute the values

therefore
<u>the answer Part a) is </u>
the length side of the copy measure is 
Part b)
we know that
the size of the original photo is------> 
the size of the copy is------> 
so

therefore
<u>the answer part b) is</u>
The size of the copy be smaller than the original
If i did the math correctly one number is 50
19 has two factors: 1, 19
21 has four factors: 1, 3, 7, 21
23 has two factors: 1, 23
And we need a number that has more than four factors and is greater than 25.
Factors of 50- 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, 50
50has six factors and is greater than 25.
If you're using the app, try seeing this answer through your browser: brainly.com/question/2822258_______________
• Function: f(x) = 3x + 12.
A. Finding the inverse of f.
The composition of f with its inverse results in the identity function:
(f o g)(x) = x
f[ g(x) ] = x
3 · g(x) + 12 = x
3 · g(x) = x – 12
x – 12
g(x) = ⸺⸺
3
x g(x) = ⸺ – 4 <——— this is the inverse of f.
3________
B. Verifying that the composition of f and g gives us the identity function:
•

![\mathsf{=f\big[g(x)\big]}\\\\\\ \mathsf{=3\cdot \left(\dfrac{x}{3}-4\right)+12}\\\\\\ \mathsf{=\diagup\hspace{-7}3\cdot \dfrac{x}{\diagup\hspace{-7}3}-3\cdot 4+12}\\\\\\ \mathsf{=x-12+12}\\\\ \mathsf{=x\qquad\quad\checkmark}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathsf%7B%3Df%5Cbig%5Bg%28x%29%5Cbig%5D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cmathsf%7B%3D3%5Ccdot%20%5Cleft%28%5Cdfrac%7Bx%7D%7B3%7D-4%5Cright%29%2B12%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Cmathsf%7B%3D%5Cdiagup%5Chspace%7B-7%7D3%5Ccdot%20%5Cdfrac%7Bx%7D%7B%5Cdiagup%5Chspace%7B-7%7D3%7D-3%5Ccdot%204%2B12%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Cmathsf%7B%3Dx-12%2B12%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Cmathsf%7B%3Dx%5Cqquad%5Cquad%5Ccheckmark%7D)
and also
•

![\mathsf{=g\big[f(x)\big]}\\\\\\ \mathsf{=\dfrac{f(x)}{3}-4}\\\\\\ \mathsf{=\dfrac{3x+12}{3}-4}\\\\\\ \mathsf{=\dfrac{\diagup\hspace{-7}3\cdot (x+4)}{\diagup\hspace{-7}3}-4}\\\\\\ \mathsf{=x+4-4}\\\\ \mathsf{=x\qquad\quad\checkmark}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmathsf%7B%3Dg%5Cbig%5Bf%28x%29%5Cbig%5D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cmathsf%7B%3D%5Cdfrac%7Bf%28x%29%7D%7B3%7D-4%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cmathsf%7B%3D%5Cdfrac%7B3x%2B12%7D%7B3%7D-4%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Cmathsf%7B%3D%5Cdfrac%7B%5Cdiagup%5Chspace%7B-7%7D3%5Ccdot%20%28x%2B4%29%7D%7B%5Cdiagup%5Chspace%7B-7%7D3%7D-4%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Cmathsf%7B%3Dx%2B4-4%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Cmathsf%7B%3Dx%5Cqquad%5Cquad%5Ccheckmark%7D)
________
C. Since f and g are inverse, then
f(g(– 2))
= (f o g)(– 2)
=
– 2 <span>✔
</span>
• Call h the compositon of f and g. So,
h(x) = (f o g)(x)
h(x) = x
As you can see above, there is no restriction for h. Therefore, the domain of h is R (all real numbers).
I hope this helps. =)