Answer:
Investment in bonds= 4,300,000
loss on investments (6,100,000-4,300,000= 1,800,000)
The unrealized holding loss ($1,800,000) on transfer to a new category of trading securities is included in income.
Explanation:
how I know is bc I've been playing the moblie game and card game since it became popular also been hearing daily about the moblie game
Answer:
The statement that is false about mortgage loans is Advertised rates are annual percentage rates.
Explanation:
Mortgage loan refers to a loan that uses real estate as collateral to receive cash upfront to be redeemed after the loan repayment is completed. if the loan is not remitted as at when due , the lender lays claim to the real estate property.
By increasing the number of payments per year you increase your effective borrowing rate.
When you use a spreadsheet to calculate your interest rates, it uses the periodic interest rate, not the annual percentage rate.
You can find a monthly payment by dividing the annual payment by 12.
However, advertised interest rate are not the same as your loan's annual percentage rate (APR) because other charges like mortgage insurance, closing costs, discount points and loan origination fees apply.
Answer:
When goods were sold to Shiva :
Shiva A/C Dr Rs.10,000
To Sales A/C Rs.10,000
(Being goods sold to Shiva)
When goods are being returned by Shiva :
Sales Returns A/C Rs.2000
To Shiva A/C Dr Rs.2000
(Being goods returned by Shiva)
When Cash is received from Shiva :
Cash A/C Dr Rs.8000
To Shiva A/C Rs.8000
(Being Cash received from Shiva)
HOPE THIS HELPS!!!
MARK IT AS BRAINLIEST!!!
Answer:1. The reason that the varsity team lost to JV team is lack of working together as a team.
2.Coach P. when selecting the rowers for the two teams should have looked at both the psychological(personality types and traits, if they are leader or followers etc.) as well as the physical aspect ( Stamina, Speed ,Coordination, Strength etc.) of each individual.
explanation:
1:Even though the varsity team consisted of the best individuals for speed , strength, coordination and endurance, they lacked the cohesiveness to perform as a unit. Each of the eight individual rowers had to be single-mindedly attuned to one another in order to synchronize their rowing and perform in unison. Unfortunately, the team also too many disruptor and lacked a leader.
2:The Coach should have experimented more by creating different scenarios to see how well the individuals responded and performed to one another in different situations when it came to a team environment. For example, putting the rowers in total control of the team's dynamics is the best hands on lesson they could ever experience. This would have allowed the rowers a deeper understanding what it take to be winner from a loser.
3.Coach P. should switch both the teams for Tuesday since after extensive observations and evaluation he has witnessed JV work as a better team. The JV team possessed better synergy, synchronization, and shared a common goal causing them to win more frequently than the Varsity team, despite the fact that the Varsity team had better individual members. In addition, there has been a precedent for switching boats. During the mid-1990’s, the Cornell Coach faced asimilar situation as Coach P. and as a result of him making the switch, both the JV and Varsity teams ended up winning the Eastern Championships. This demonstrates that it is more likely thatthe teams will win if they agree to switch. Moreover, even if Coach P. decided not to switch the teams, it would have taken quite a while to rebuild Varsity’s team structure, morale, and overall team synergy, implying that they probably would not have been ready in time to compete and win the race as the Varsity team anyway.
Answer:
This is a very unlikely situation, since the plant must be really large and the river probably didn't carry a lot of water in the first place. But even if this was possible, it would be illegal for a company to use 100% of the natural resources available. No law or regulation (municipal, state or federal) would allow such thing to happen and assuming it got to court, the court would rule against the company.
Since you need an environmental impact report before you start building a factory, then it would be unlikely that the factory or plant was legally authorized to operate in the first place. The only option is that they built a dam and that is highly regulated.
