Answer:
Hi there, so its known for fur, seals, peguins, etc. Hope this helps <3
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is
Explanation:
The secession of South Carolina and forming of the Confederates all happened after Abraham Lincoln became president and bloody Kansas happened before Lincoln was elected.
The Anti-Federalists’ main objection to ratifying the Constitution was that it would place too much power in the hands of the federal government over the individual states. This is why they insisted on a "Bill of Rights" to be added to the Constitution to protect individual liberty.
Based on the information provided, it seems like the answer would be the freedom of the press.
The freedom of the press is a 1st amendment right that allows investigative journalists to spread information to the public about candidates and their policies. The ability to share this information without the threat of persecution is a critical element of having a fair election. The citizens should have all the information about a candidates policies/programs in order to make an educated decision as to who would be the best person for the job.
In telling the history of the United States and also of the nations of the Western Hemisphere in general, historians have wrestled with the problem of what to call the hemisphere's first inhabitants. Under the mistaken impression he had reached the “Indies,” explorer Christopher Columbus called the people he met “Indians.” This was an error in identification that has persisted for more than five hundred years, for the inhabitants of North and South America had no collective name by which they called themselves.
Historians, anthropologists, and political activists have offered various names, none fully satisfactory. Anthropologists have used “aborigine,” but the term suggests a primitive level of existence inconsistent with the cultural level of many tribes. Another term, “Amerindian,” which combines Columbus's error with the name of another Italian explorer, Amerigo Vespucci (whose name was the source of “America”), lacks any historical context. Since the 1960s, “Native American” has come into popular favor, though some activists prefer “American Indian.” In the absence of a truly representative term, descriptive references such as “native peoples” or “indigenous peoples,” though vague, avoid European influence. In recent years, some argument has developed over whether to refer to tribes in the singular or plural—Apache or Apaches—with supporters on both sides demanding political correctness.
