Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members
Other biased sources include the following:
- Political party members of the President,
- Previous schools the current President attended,
- Family of the current President
- The political party the President belonged to,
- The special assistants to the current President, etc.
The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20646239
Answer:
In the case of Parsons v. State, 1887, the Irresistible Impulse Test was first introduced.
Explanation:
The Court of Alabama stated that, although it would have been possible that the defendant had right from wrong, that he had "dismissed the power of choice between right and wrong" and that, "at a time when his free organization was destroyed," and that therefore, the alleged crime was so closely related, in relation to cause and effect, to such a mental disease that it has been the result of.
I hope this was understood very well, and as always, I am joyous to assist anyone at any time. ☺️
