In "What Made Me Do What I Did", Kaneko Fumiko is a socially cognizant individual that doesn't generally have confidence in development in light of purge words, and endeavors to discover significance in life through whatever it is that she chooses to do as opposed to the aftereffect of what she does. All through the story, she runs from being sad with an antagonistic point of view and society to turning into an exceptionally energetic individual, in spite of the fact that without a genuine objective. She never had a decent association with her folks who surrendered and later repudiated her. The aftereffect of her association with her folks drove her to have her skeptical and communist convictions. The dropping out of her sentimental association with Segawa was what prompted her to wind up more free in the wake of understanding that he was not genuine of the relationship nor a capable individual. Meeting Hyeon made her more impassive about being isolated from individuals after he cleared out her in a circuitous manner. Her association with Hatsuyo, which was depicted as the nearest she had been to another lady, made her more determined and energetic about her perspectives on society. It is additionally what persuaded that it was smarter to discover importance in what she does instead of the outcomes. Meeting Pak Yeol was the start she expected to at last understand her objective of beginning her own development for the advantage of the abused and what made her a rebel.
They wanted access to Africa’s natural resources such as rubber, wood and arable land. It was also seen as an opportunity to grow their economy and build a stronger union
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
Answer:
Christianity was outlawed
Explanation:
Christianity was made illegal and many Christians were killed.
