Answer:
a. Analytical review of loan agreement.
Inquiry from management about the loans and its covenants.
Observing the management behavior towards covenants.
Inspecting the effects of each covenant on business activities.
b. According to IAS 24, related party transactions the loan from president should be disclosed.
Explanation:
Loans are a source of funding to a business. Many organizations prefers high debt funding as it is a cheap source of finance. On the other hand high debt companies are considered as risky. When an auditor analyses the loan covenants he must ensure that he reads the complete agreement and analyses the effects that each covenant has on the company's performance. Loan covenants are always considered as flagged as this is an important area which requires detailed audit. In the given scenario the loans are taken against company's inventory and receivable accounts which is a threat to company's working capital. There are covenants imposed not to distribute any dividend to shareholders. These will create a liquidity position for a company if the loan is not paid on time and company will not have sufficient amount of working capital to fund its routine expenses and business operations.
b. IAS 24 provides detailed guidance on discloses for transaction involving related party. The president of a company has provided loan to the company this should be disclosed in the notes. The transaction should be in the arms length and disclosures should be made for every transaction.
Answer:
$2,500
Explanation:
Loan amount = $5,000
The car was auctioned for $3,000 and the parties involved in the auction transaction has to be paid before net income can be recognized.
Auction amount = $3,000
Less; Repo Man's Fee = ($200)
Attorney's Fee = ($300)
Net amount = $2,500
Loan amount = $5,000
Less net amount = ($2,500)
Loan Balance = $2,500
Answer:
The correct answer is the demand has increased.
Explanation:
At the market price of $5/unit, the quantity demanded is 20 units.
Last year at the price level of $4, the quantity demanded was 20 units.
We see that even though the price has increased the quantity demanded is the same. This indicates that the demand has increased.
When there is an increase in the demand for a commodity, the demand curve moves to the right. This upward or rightward shift in the demand curve will cause the price of the commodity to increase. Though the quantity demanded will be the same.
Answer:
That the car wash was not liable to the plaintiff because the car wash employees had no notice they were taking responsibility for so much jewelry.
Explanation:
The case of Ziva Jewelry Inc., v. Car Wash Headquarters Inc involved a salesperson Stewart who locked jewellery in his car and took it to the car wash.
He did not disclose that there was expensive jewelry in the car.
The attendant finished washing the car and signalled to Stewart that his car was ready and walked away from the car.
Before Stewart could pay the bill someone had taken the car. Although the police recovered the car the jewellery was stolen.
Zeva Jewellry filed a motion against the car wash that they did not excercise due care in returning the vehicle.
In this instance the car wash was not liable because Stewart did not disclose there was expensive jewelry in the car.
Also the attendant had finished with his car and informed him of this. So it was out of their care when the car theft occured
