Answer: $942 U
Explanation:
Budgeted cost was $2,960 per month plus $326 per day and there were 18 days of actual activity.
Budgeted cost = 2,960 + 326 * 18
= $8,828
Variance = Budgeted cost - Actual cost
= 8,828 - 9,770
= -$942
Budgeted cost is less than Actual cost which means the Variance is UNFAVORABLE.
Answer:
Decreasing taxes would result in a loss of money from government funded organizations and other government jobs. There would be a lower budget for public schools and the salaries of police forces, post offices, and teachers would be forced to be cut. However, this would also raise economic activity, increasing people's ability to buy and coontribute more to the flow of money.
Explanation:
Answer:
The current and past missed preferred stock dividend payments must be made before a common stock dividend payment can be made.
Explanation:
Answer:
$45.027 million
Explanation:
The accounting equation shows the relationship between the various elements of the balance sheet. These are the assets, liabilities and equity. It is given as
Assets = Liabilities + Equity
The owner's equity is made up of the common stock and retained earnings (which is the net income less dividend paid over the period).
Equity = $125.989 million - $77.152 million
= $48.837 million
Retained earnings = Equity - Common stock
= $48.837 million - $3.810 million
= $45.027 million
Digby Corporation's retained earnings is $45.027 million
Answer:
1) When there is only one car dealership in a small town, giving the dealership the ability to influence the price of cars, market failure is due to <u>MARKET POWER.
</u>
2) When a manufacturing plant dumps chemical waste into a nearby river, poisoning the water supply for a small town downstream, market failure is due to <u>EXTERNALITY.</u>
Explanation:
The car dealership has an excessive market power
, which refers to the firms ability to increase the price of its products (cars) above the price of a competitive market.
When the manufacturing plant dumps chemical wastes into the river, it is causing a negative externality on the town's water supply. This means that the town (which is a third party in this case) is suffering from the actions of another party's economic transactions.
