Answer:
The minimum age lies between 18 to 25
Explanation:
The drafter of the constitution of the united states assigned a particular minimum age to represent the house. The minimum age lies between 18 to 25. some states have assigned 21 as the minimum age to be house representative and about one-third of the state, assigned 18 as the minimum age for state senate.
For governor position, the minimum age that mentioned in the constitution is 30 and It is primarily a state who has assigned different age for different position.
He said that if communists win the Greek civil war, it will cause instability in Turkey, which would ultimately affect the Middle-Eastern political stability. And The President said that considering United States' intense involvement in the Middle-Eastern security, US must take steps. He said that "<span>the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures"</span>
I believe he controlled people opinions, the influenced them with games and other things. Public feasts and holidays were another popular opinion influence.
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
We have the best economy and the most rights
