Answer:
so your house looks presentable for an odd occasion of importance
Explanation:
Answer:
to torture and eliminate Jews
Explanation:
A concentration camp or internment camp is a detention or confinement center where people are locked up because they belong to a generic collective instead of their individual acts, without prior trial and without judicial guarantees, although there may be an integrated legal coverage in a system of political repression. Concentration camps are often used to lock up political opponents, specific ethnic or religious groups, people of a certain sexual orientation, prisoners of war, civilians living in a region in conflict or other collectives.
Unlike a prison camp, which is used as a detention center for enemy soldiers in a conflict, a concentration camp is used mostly for the detention of non-combatants, although in some historical periods they were also used to imprison prisoners of war. war. They are publicly known detention centers, usually large.
The work camp is considered a variant, a concentration camp where prisoners are subjected to forced labor, often in deplorable conditions.
Due to the mistreatment of the civilian population during the Second World War, the Fourth Geneva Convention was drafted in 1949, specifically legislating on the treatment of the civilian population by the warring parties in a conflict.
Locals in Texas town supported Stephen Austin against his charges.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Stephen Austin was a very impact revolutionist and he always wanted the independence of Texas. In the year 1834, in January when the government of Mexico thought that he was responsible for probing people against the government and the authority.
He got arrested and was behind the bars for eight months but there were no charges against him because no court was ready to take up his case because of the amount of support he was given by the people of Mexico.
D, the enlightenment was about Natural Rights (Locke), and that is the exact opposite of what Louis XIV wanted
Answer:
Ogden (1824). In this Commerce Clause case, the Supreme Court affirmed Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce, and held that by virtue of the Supremacy Clause, state laws “must yield” to constitutional acts of Congress.
