Answer:
Y = C + I + G + NX
S = Y - C
S = I + G + NX
Explanation:
National Income Y = C + I + G + NX ; {where consumption, investment, government purchases, net exports ie exports - imports are corresponding expenditure of households, firms, government, rest of the world}
National Saving (S) is income (Y) left after paying for consumption (C) . So, S = Y - C
Using above equations, Y = C + S , Y = C + I + G + NX
C + S = C + I + G + NX
So, S = I + G + NX
Answer:
C.
standards for the basic minimum wage and overtime pay
Explanation:
Hope this helps you
Pls mark me the brainliest
Answer:
1. On the statement of cash flow record the sale of the asset under the investment section.
2. -$16,000
Explanation:
In Cash flow Statements every asset purchases and sales are viewed as investments, so you record asset sales in the investment section of the cash flow.
Therefore the exact value of the sales is recorded.
Answer:
The correct option is its aim is to review internal processes independently of the external industry environment
Explanation:
The first option is wrong because it only made mention of the internal strengths and weaknesses,there is no mention of external opportunities and threats
The second option is obviously wrong as SWOT has no direct link with classifying assets as tangible or intangible.
It is not conducted by regulatory agencies as it is not a regulatory requirement
Lastly ,internal processes refer to strengths and weakness while opportunities and threats emanate from the external industry environment
Hello There!
Your answer would be <u>C). A tortious act may also be a criminal act.</u>
The reason why C would be your answer is because a tortious act is something that harms someone in any way. The reason why it "may" be a criminal act is because determine if the tortious act is a criminal act really depends on the scenario that is occurring. For example, someone could cause a tortious act in a way of self defense, this scenario would be debatable because the person that committed the tortious act had a valid reason in doing so, and that was protecting themselves. But, if a person was to cause a tortious act by hurting someone to steal from them, then that would definitely be a criminal act because they are performing dangerous things to someone else, and the person could file a lawsuit against it.
Let's dive into why the other answer choices are incorrect. We can use the old fashion process of elimination:
Answer choice "A). A tortious act is always a criminal act" is incorrect because it is not always a criminal act, it depends on the scenario it's in. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "B). A criminal act is always a tortious act" is incorrect because there are MANY criminal acts that doesn't harm anyone, for example, tax evasion (not paying taxes) is a criminal act, but does not cause any harm to anyone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
Answer choice "D). A tortious act is the same as a contract dispute" is incorrect because harming someone is not the same as not doing what a contract says. A contact dispute is when someone that's part of a contract did not do a duty that the contract says that they're suppose to do, and that usually doesn't have to be any harm to anyone. That would not be the same as a tortious act, harming someone. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.
