There are 260 calories in the whole can.
to get this you multiply the calories in one serving by the amount of total servings, in this case 2.
Answer:
Tonya proof is correct
and Pearl proof is wrong
Step-by-step explanation:
AKL and GKB are obviously congruent. But the reasons given are different, One of the justification is Vertical Angles Theorem, and the other is Adjacent Angles.
But the correct justification is the Vertical Angles Theorem, because the angles are Vertically away from each other, or the angles are at opposite sides of each other. Which is when Vertical Angles Theorem is applied.
Making Tonya correct since that was the answer he given.
The definition of Adjacent Angles is incorrect, this Theorem is used when the angles are Adjacent to each other. When the angles are on the same line as the other angle, is when the definition of Adjacent Angles is applied. Not in this situation
Is there a picture i could see?
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
I'll it explain it as soon as it sends
20 x 4 - 100 ÷ 5
Pemdas First parenthesis then multiplica or division and the addition or subtraction. Everything from left to right
first multiplication
80 - 100 ÷ 5
Then division
80-5
then subtraction
75
Answer:
Rs. 924000.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cost of house = 765000
Additional money spent on it = 115000
Total cost incurred by Ravi = 765000 + 115000 = 880000
Gain = 5% of total cost
gain in Rs = 5/100 * 880000 = Rs. 44000
Total selling price of house = total cost incurred + profit = 880000+ 44000
Total selling price of house = Rs. 924000
Thus, Ravi got Rs. 924000.
