Although you have neglected to include the graph, it is possible to answer this question. The right answer is the first one: based on the graph, a conclusion that can be drawn about the textile industry is that textile factories employed more children during the mid-1800s, coinciding with a peak of high productivity. In fact, younger, and not older, children were increasingly employed as workforce in factories and mines during the first decades of the 19th century.
The Answer Is Ferns I Think
Hello! Vas happenin?
I hope you have a good day or a good sleep. Remember your beautiful just the way you are. If your a guy your awesome just the way you are. Don’t change for anyone
-Zayn Malik
Answer:
The benefits of trade agreements are not felt evenly by all industries in an economy. In fact, even member nations gain varying advantages by entering into trade agreements. However, despite these drawbacks, the United States continues to act on its commitment to free trade. In 2005, the United States signed a fair trade agreement (FTA) with Australia, and in 2012, it signed a trade protection agreement (TPA) with Colombia. Both agreements have been in force for a while. Now the question is, Have these agreements benefited the US economy? Let’s examine the impact of the bilateral agreements with Colombia and Australia on the US economy.
According to the USTR, the International Trade Commission (ITC) predicted that the United States–Colombia TPA would increase national GDP by $2.5 billion (Office of the US Trade Representative). Under the TPA, US exports to Colombia increased from $12.0 billion in 2010 to $18.3 billion in 2013 (US Department of State). The TPA seems to have delivered on its promise, because according to the USTR, US exports to Colombia increased by 30% in 2013 (Office of the US Trade Representative). So financially, Colombia is a lucrative market for the United States. However, the main opposition to the TPA stemmed from concerns about the terrible labor conditions in Colombia and the violent threats to those seeking to improve labor conditions in a country rife with crime. Although violence is a major concern, the FTA will eventually help both nations by bringing about social and labor reforms through economic activity. By helping Colombia become a peaceful country, the United States can pave the way for increased trade with Colombia in the future.
The United States–Australia FTA received considered opposition in both countries. US dairy farmers, ranchers, and small farmers were anxious about job losses resulting from the free entry of Australian products into the US market. However, if we judge by the boost in exports, the FTA has contributed to overall US economic growth. According to the USTR, in the first five years of the FTA, US exports to Australia increased by 33% (Office of the US Trade Representative). The FTA removed all tariffs on American imports into Australia, giving US exporters barrier-free entry into Australian markets.
The export industry plays a key role in driving economic growth and generating jobs in the United States. Colombia and Australia are two large and important markets for US exporters. The United States faces competition from other nations for access to these markets. By signing trade agreements, American goods can compete effectively in these markets. Although the agreements with Colombia and Australia are opposed for valid reasons, the agreements will benefit the US economy over time
Explanation:
Created a dividing line at latitude 36° 30'
<em>The Missouri Compromise was a law that was passed to admit Main as a free State of the United States at the same time Missouri was considered a slave state. It was needed so a balance was maintained between pro-slavery states and free states. As a part of it, a parallel was drawn on 36 30’ which prohibited slavery north of the parallel, excluding Missouri.</em>
No territory gained from Mexico should become a slave state.
<em>The Wilmot Proviso was a proposal of an law that aimed to prohibit slavery in all territory that was acquired from Mexico following the Mexican-American War. Although it wasn’t successful the debate it sparkled lasted for some years.</em>
Divided the Nebraska territory into two parts
<em>The Kansas-Nebraska Act was an Act that divided the Nebraska Territory into two parts: Nebraska and Kansas. But the problem was that the Act violated the Missouri Compromise since both territories should not be allowed to have slaves because of its location north of 36, 30’N. With that, they let the population decide if the states should be slave free or not, which brought up a series of conflicts.</em>
4. The Crittenden Compromise
Proposed six amendments to the Constitution
<em>The Crittenden Compromise was a proposal that aimed to express the right to have slaves on the US Constitution, this way it would be unconstitutional to ban slavery in the future. It consisted of six constitutional amendments. It was introduced in 1860 and it had popularity between Southern members of Senate but president Abraham Lincoln opposed the compromise and both of the House of Representatives and the Senate rejected it.</em>
<em />
