1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KATRIN_1 [288]
4 years ago
15

Why would tires have unitary elasticity while gasoline is inelastic?

Physics
2 answers:
kati45 [8]4 years ago
7 0
Tires have unitary elasticity while gasoline is inelastic because they are not as immediate of a need as gasoline. If for example you run out of gas, you have to buy some to get to where you were going but for tires you have to wait and decide where to purchase and what kinds of tires to purchase
soldi70 [24.7K]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

  • buying gasoline is a daily decision.

Explanation:

We could assume that<u> buying gasoline is a more immediate decision than buying tires</u>, which leads us to think about the most accessible, loading gasoline 1 or 2 times per week depending on the use, <em>a large monthly amount disguised in small expenses.</em> But when buying tires, seeing the total amount makes us<em> think more about when and where you buy them.</em>

You might be interested in
What is energy?<br> the ability to do work<br> chemical change <br> force <br> force x distance
nika2105 [10]
From my notes it’s the ability to do work
3 0
3 years ago
A box is given a push so that it slides across the floor. How far will it go, given that the coefficient of kinetic friction is
ollegr [7]
<span>F = ma
</span>Ff = μ*Fn
<span>Fn = Fw
</span>Fw = mg 

<span>So we have: </span>

<span>Ff = μmg </span>

<span>And </span>

<span>Ff = ma </span>

<span>So... </span>

<span>μmg = ma </span><span> </span>

<span>μg = a </span>

<span>And we can solve for the acceleration: </span>

<span>(0.15)(9.81 m/s²) = a </span>

<span>a = 1.47 m/s² </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If Mercury, moved two orbital paths closer to the sun: what would be different? List serval differences, ideas.......
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
Well first of all, when it comes to orbits of the planets around
the sun, there's no such thing as "orbital paths", in the sense
of definite ("quantized") distances that the planets can occupy
but not in between.  That's the case with the electrons in an atom,
but a planet's orbit can be any old distance from the sun at all. 

If Mercury, or any planet, were somehow moved to an orbit closer
to the sun, then ...

-- its speed in orbit would be greater,

-- the distance around its orbit would be shorter,

-- its orbital period ("year") would be shorter,

-- the temperature everywhere on its surface would be higher,

-- if it has an atmosphere now, then its atmosphere would become
less dense, and might soon disappear entirely,

-- the intensity of x-rays, charged particles, and other forms of
solar radiation arriving at its surface would be greater.
5 0
3 years ago
most responsible for the formation of a star is most responsible for the formation of a star is blank Force
Bad White [126]
That would be gravitational force. Check out creation.com. Search up "star-formation" in their search bar. Hope this helped.
5 0
4 years ago
A man stands on the roof of a 15.0-m-tall building and throws a rock with a speed of 30.0 m&gt;s at an angle of 33.0%1b above th
Brilliant_brown [7]
The motion described here is a projectile motion which is characterized by an arc-shaped direction of motion. There are already derived equations for this type of motions as listed:

Hmax = v₀²sin²θ/2g
t = 2v₀sinθ/g
y = xtanθ + gx²/(2v₀²cos²θ)

where

Hmax = max. height reached by the object in a projectile motion
θ=angle of inclination
v₀= initial velocity
t = time of flight
x = horizontal range
y = vertical height

Part A. 

Hmax = v₀²sin²θ/2g = (30²)(sin 33°)²/2(9.81)
Hmax = 13.61 m

Part B. In this part, we solve the velocity when it almost reaches the ground. Approximately, this is equal to y = 28.61 m and x = 31.91 m. In projectile motion, it is important to note that there are two component vectors of motion: the vertical and horizontal components. In the horizontal component, the motion is in constant speed or zero acceleration. On the other hand, the vertical component is acting under constant acceleration. So, we use the two equations of rectilinear motion:

y = v₀t + 1/2 at²
28.61 = 30(t) + 1/2 (9.81)(t²)
t = 0.839 seconds

a = (v₁-v₀)/t
9.81 = (v₁ - 30)/0.839
v₁ = 38.23 m/s

Part C. 
y = xtanθ + gx²/(2v₀²cos²θ)
Hmax + 15 = xtanθ + gx²/(2v₀²cos²θ)
13.61 + 15 = xtan33° + (9.81)x²/[2(30)²(cos33°)²]
Solving using a scientific calculator,
x = 31.91 m

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happens to the kinetic energy of a snowball as it rolls and gains mass.
    14·2 answers
  • A batter hits a baseball m = 0.41 kg from rest with a force of F = 81
    9·1 answer
  • The nuclear fuel distribution in a nuclear reactor is chosen so that when in operation the wall temperature of the reactor is a
    8·1 answer
  • Order these sounds from loudest (1)
    9·2 answers
  • How can you demonstrate that charged objects exert forces, both attractive and repulsive
    14·1 answer
  • A pitcher claims he can throw a 0.146-kg baseball with as much momentum as a 2.70-g bullet moving with a speed of 1.50 ✕ 103 m/s
    13·1 answer
  • In what scenario will an athletes wrist be under tension
    15·1 answer
  • If an astronaut goes on a space walk outside the Space Station, she will quickly float away from the station unless she has a te
    7·1 answer
  • I have a device that can generate sounds with frequencies between 800 Hz and 1600 Hz. I also have an unlabeled tuning fork that
    9·1 answer
  • A student starts a food fight by throwing a 0.5 kg burrito at some girl he likes. He throws it kind-of hard so he accelerates it
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!