Answer:
34 m/s
Explanation:
Potential energy at top = kinetic energy at bottom + work done by friction
PE = KE + W
mgh = ½ mv² + Fd
mg (d sin θ) = ½ mv² + Fd
Solving for v:
½ mv² = mg (d sin θ) − Fd
mv² = 2mg (d sin θ) − 2Fd
v² = 2g (d sin θ) − 2Fd/m
v = √(2g (d sin θ) − 2Fd/m)
Given g = 9.8 m/s², d = 150 m, θ = 28°, F = 50 N, and m = 65 kg:
v = √(2 (9.8 m/s²) (150 m sin 28°) − 2 (50 N) (150 m) / (65 kg))
v = 33.9 m/s
Rounded to two significant figures, her velocity at the bottom of the hill is 34 m/s.
Answer:
a
b
The value is 
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The mass is 
The spring constant is 
The instantaneous speed is 
The position consider is x = 0.750A meters from equilibrium point
Generally from the law of energy conservation we have that
The kinetic energy induced by the hammer = The energy stored in the spring
So
Here a is the amplitude of the subsequent oscillations
=> 
=> 
=>
Generally from the law of energy conservation we have that
The kinetic energy by the hammer = The energy stored in the spring at the point considered + The kinetic energy at the considered point
=> 
=>
Answer:
D would be it
Explanation:
cause none of the rest Makes sense to the book of the picture and I'm 100% sure =)
Answer:
the app your on now is great and can ask anything
Answer:
b) directional
Explanation:
The prediction that alcohol slows reaction time is Directional . This is because for alcohol to be known as one which slows reaction time means there have been various hypothesis conducted which supports this.
In this case, formulation of a null hypothesis is usually necessary which means that alcohol does not slow reaction time and another alternative hypothesis that suggests that alcohol slows reaction time.
