Answer:
MR = 10 – 1q1.
Explanation:
Demand function, P = 20 – 0.5Q
Q = q1 + q2
Now insert Q in the P = 20 – 0.5Q.
P = 20 – 0.5 (q1 + q2)
We have the value of q2 = 20.
P = 20 – 0.5 (q1 + q2)
P = 20 – 0.5 (q1 + 20)
P = 20 – 0.5q1 – 10
P = 10 – 0.5q1
Total revenue of firm 1, TR = Pq1
TR = 10q1 – (0.5q1)^2
Now MR is the differentiation of TR. So the MR after differentiation if TR of firm 1 is:
MR = 10 – 1q1
The truth in the loan policy requires that a creditor to notify the borrowers of what money is going to cost them before using it.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Truth in Loaning Act (TILA) is a national law enacted in 1968 that guarantees consumer protection and informs consumers of the true cost of borrowing. To order to ensure that customers can easily equate shop interest rates and terms, TILA allows loan requirements to be reported in a readily understandable manner.
The TILA proposes laws related for closed accounts (for example, home and car loans) or open accounts (for example, credit cards). It does not limit the amount of interest that banks can pay or offer a loan to banks.
Answer:
$12,240
Explanation:
Social security Tax = $80,000 x 12.4%
Social security Tax = $9,920
Medicare Tax = $80,0000 x 2.9%
Medicare Tax = $2,320
Total tax = $9,920 + $2,320
Total tax = $12,240
Esmeralda's promise is not enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable because society does not want gifts cheapened by making them legally enforceable.
A legally enforceable contract means that you can keep the promise of the other party. If the other party fails or refuses to meet its obligations, the contract can be fulfilled in accordance with the law.
A non-enforceable contract or transaction is valid but not enforced by the court. Unenforceable is typically used in conflict with void (or void ab initio) and voidable. If the parties implement the agreement, it is valid, otherwise, the court will not enforce them.
Learn more about legally enforceable here:brainly.com/question/7306383
#SPJ1
Answer:
$80,000
Explanation:
The computation of allocation labeling expenses is shown below:-
Overhead rate = Labeling process cost ÷ Labels generated
$320,000 ÷ $640,000
= $0.5 per label
Allocation labeling expenses = Wine estimated bottles × Overhead rate
= $160,000 × $0.5
= $80,000
Therefore for computing the allocation labeling expenses we simply applied the above formula.
