Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.
Here, we are decide the best option between making the part or buying the part.
a. Make or Buy Analysis
Particulars Make amount Buy amount
Direct Materials $4.50
Direct Labor $1.00
Overhead (80% of Direct Labor) $0.80
Cost to buy <u> </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost per unit <u>$5.70 </u> <u>$4.70</u>
Cost Difference = $5.70 - $4.70
Cost Difference = $1.00
Therefore, the cost difference of making amount over buying amount is $1.00.
b. Because of the difference, Beto should buy the part because its cost is lesser than to make the part.
Therefore, the buying of the part is the best decision.
See similar solution about Analysis
<em>brainly.com/question/23287319</em>
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Profit is Maximize when MR = MC
since MR=40 - 0.5Q
and MC= 4
Therefore:
40-0.5Q = 4
-0.5Q = 4 - 40
-0.5Q= -36
divide through by -0.5
Q = 72
since Q = 72
from Q = 160 - 4p
72 = 160 - 4P
-4p = 72 - 160
-4P = -88
divide through by -4
P = 22
