Answer:
8.60%
Explanation:
We use the MM proposition II with taxes

ra 0.125
D 5000
E 9600 (14,600 assets = 5,000 liab + equity)
rd ??
taxes 0.34
re 0.1384
We set p the formula and solve:





rd = 0.860181818 = 8.60%
Answer:
A) By product pricing
Explanation:
If you are able to sell your companies by products it is a great way to make more money and to reduce costs. Imagine if the cheese factories needed to throw away all that brine. They would need to develop some waste disposal facility which obviously costs money to build and operate. Instead they are lowering their costs by selling it and at the same time are getting more money. They would probably even give it away for free if no one was willing to pay for it.
Answer:
D. continuous review system
Explanation:
In the context of manufacturing it seems that the system being described would be a continuous review system. Like mentioned in the question this is a system that automatically adjusts the stock level in real time when a product moves in or out of stock, and automatically triggers an order for more stock as soon as the stock level hits a low quantity point is hit.
Answer: (i) $20 per model
(ii) $27 per model
(iii) Ginny has a comparative advantage in building models.
Explanation:
A country or a firm has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that commodity in terms of other commodities is lower than the other country or firm.
Opportunity cost is the benefit that is foregone for an individual by choosing one alternative over other alternatives available to him.
If the opportunity cost is lower for an individual then this will benefit him whereas if the opportunity cost is higher then this will not benefit the individuals.
Therefore,
Ginny's Opportunity cost of producing one model = 
= $20 per model
Eric’s opportunity cost of building models = $20 + 35% of $20
= $20 + $7
= $27 per model
Hence, Ginny has a comparative advantage in building models because Ginny's opportunity cost of building model is lower than Eric's opportunity cost.