Answer:
Explanation:
Using the EOQ Formula = EOQ
D = Demand = 773
O = Ordering Cost =28
H = holding Cost = 11*33% =3.63
So we have :
EOQ=
EOQ= 
EOQ=
EOQ= 
EOQ= 109.20196
Previous per unit order cost = 28/773 =0.03622
No of Orders = D/o
No of Orders = 773/109.20196 =7.0786
Cost per order =109.20196*0.03622 =3.9555
Total order cost= 7.0786*3.9555=27.9998
At EOQ holding Cost is equal to Order Cost
New Order cost =27.9998
Holding Cost = 27.9998
New cost As per EOQ = 56
Previous (33+28) = 61
Net Saving = 5
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Warranty expense A/c Dr $25,500
To Estimated warranty liability $25,500
(Being the estimated warranty provision is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
= Merchandise sale value × given percentage
= $850,000 × 3%
= $25,500
Simply we debited the warranty expense and credited the estimated warranty liability so that the correct posting can be done.
Assuming that you have the values for the year 2017, the break-even point would be 1500 units for the year 2017. To calculate this, we use the idea that at the breaking point, total sales is equal to the total cost or expenses made. Which would be:
selling (x) = fixed + variable (x)
x = fixed / (selling - variable)
x = 270000 / (600-420)
x = 1500 units
Answer:
EPS = $4.50
diluted EPS = $2.46
Explanation:
no option is correct since EPS = $4.50, and the rest of the options are all higher amounts. Diluted EPS are always smaller than EPS.
common stock outstanding = 1,000 stocks
bonds shares (diluted) = 1,000 stocks
net income = $4,500
bond interest = $10,000 x 6% x (1 - 30%) = $420
diluted earnings per share = ($4,500 + $420) / (1,000 shares + 1,000 shares) = $4,920 / 2,000 shares = $2.46
