Hevehebudhsbsjeijsjxygsgsyewgwgsgsgghshshdjdisissisisisisiisiediididuxuzuuzuzuzuzuzusuusususuuwuwueiwueueueueueueuusisisisisididiididodizozoaowowoaoaosossosoxocococococoxodicixoxoxooxxoxoxs
Back then, status was a factor in your life that would matter greatly. The ranking of a citizen would mean where they were in life, and where exactly they would stay. Well, patricians were the rich society.They were all highly respected for their riches and overwhelming amounts of power. Then you had plebeians, who were the generic people.The basic families. Farmers, merchants, street sweepers, that kind of thing. They had no say in government, unlike the patricians.
It should be noted that the people who argue that justices should be willing to overturn laws are known to be supporting judicial activism.
Judicial activism simply refers to the practice in the judiciary of protecting the individual rights of an individual through the decisions that depart from the precedents that are already established.
It's about the willingness of a judge to be able to strike down another governmental branch or overturn a judicial precedent. They enforce their own views regarding constitutional requirements.
Learn more about justice on:
brainly.com/question/25756666
Answer:
It protected the empire from invasion.
Explanation:
At that time, a conflict of interest exist in India in terms of the spread of Islam and Buddhism. (Asoka wanted to spread Buddhism while the kingdoms in middle east wanted to spread Islam).
As a result, Mauryan empire's territory often faced a lot of potential invasion from the empires that resided in the middle east. In order to handle this, Asoka created a group of spending army that could be mobilized to handle every scale of invasions. Mauryan Empire’s standing army consisted of 600,000 soldiers, 35,000 cavalry, and 6,500 war elephants that were directly led by Asoka.
